Abstract:Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify and discuss key risk factors in the use of forensic science in the criminal justice system by adopting a holistic and systemic approach that examines the collection and use of forensic evidence from crime scene to court. Design/methodology/approach – The research on which the paper is based was a mixed-method five-year study of the effectiveness of forensic science in the criminal justice system in Australia using qualitative and quantitative methods. The paper draws on the in-depth analysis of qualitative data from 11 case studies of investigations of serious crime to identify key risk factors in the use of forensic science from crime scene to court. Findings – Six key risk factors in the forensic process from crime scene to court are identified: low level of forensic awareness among first responders; crime scene examiners (CSEs) as technicians rather than professionals; inefficient and/or ineffective laboratory processes; limited forensic literacy among key actors in the criminal justice system; poor communication between key actors in the criminal justice system; and, financial resources not directed at the front end of the forensic process. Overall the findings demonstrate that forensic science is not well embedded in the criminal justice system. Practical implications – The paper suggests that the risks inherent in the current practice of forensic science in the criminal justice system can be reduced dramatically through: forensic awareness training among first responders; the professionalisation of CSEs; continued improvements in efficiency and effectiveness at the laboratory with a focus on timeliness and quality; greater forensic literacy among actors in the criminal justice system; appropriate avenues of communication between agencies, practitioners and policymakers in the criminal justice system; and increased allocation of resources to the front end of the forensic process. Originality/value – By adopting a holistic, systemic approach to the analysis of forensic science in the criminal justice system, and identifying inherent risks in the system, this paper contributes to the emerging body of research on the social processes that impact on the effectiveness of forensic science.

A response to: "NIST experts urge caution in use of courtroom evidence presentation method"

Likelihood Ratio as Weight of Forensic Evidence: A Metrological Perspective

Commentary on Guyll et al. (2023): Misuse of Statistical Method Results in Highly Biased Interpretation of Forensic Evidence

Defence Against the Modern Arts: the Curse of Statistics "Score-based likelihood ratios"

A review of likelihood ratios in forensic science based on a critique of Stiffelman "No longer the Gold standard: Probabilistic genotyping is changing the nature of DNA evidence in criminal trials"

Forensic science evidence: Naive estimates of false positive error rates and reliability

A call for open science in forensics

Demonstrative Evidence and the Use of Algorithms in Jury Trials

Calculation of forensic likelihood ratios: Use of Monte Carlo simulations to compare the output of score-based approaches with true likelihood-ratio values

Juror understanding of the weight of evidence presented as a likelihood ratio and the impact on the deliberative process: a response to Buckleton, et al.

The Influence of Validation Data on Logical and Scientific Interpretations of Forensic Expert Opinions

A Bayesian approach for the analysis of error rate studies in forensic science

Evidential strength of categorical expert witness statements

Using Bayes factors to limit forensic testimony to forensics: composite hypotheses

Editorial: Statistics and forensic science

On forensic likelihood ratios from low-coverage sequencing

On the limitations of probabilistic claims about the probative value of mixed DNA profile evidence

The effect of following best practice reporting recommendations on legal and community evaluations of forensic examiners reports

Forensic science as “risky business”: identifying key risk factors in the forensic process from crime scene to court

Bayesian Reasoning and Evidence Communication

A Note on the Specific Source Identification Problem in Forensic Science in the Presence of Uncertainty about the Background Population