Abstract:Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify and discuss key risk factors in the use of forensic science in the criminal justice system by adopting a holistic and systemic approach that examines the collection and use of forensic evidence from crime scene to court. Design/methodology/approach – The research on which the paper is based was a mixed-method five-year study of the effectiveness of forensic science in the criminal justice system in Australia using qualitative and quantitative methods. The paper draws on the in-depth analysis of qualitative data from 11 case studies of investigations of serious crime to identify key risk factors in the use of forensic science from crime scene to court. Findings – Six key risk factors in the forensic process from crime scene to court are identified: low level of forensic awareness among first responders; crime scene examiners (CSEs) as technicians rather than professionals; inefficient and/or ineffective laboratory processes; limited forensic literacy among key actors in the criminal justice system; poor communication between key actors in the criminal justice system; and, financial resources not directed at the front end of the forensic process. Overall the findings demonstrate that forensic science is not well embedded in the criminal justice system. Practical implications – The paper suggests that the risks inherent in the current practice of forensic science in the criminal justice system can be reduced dramatically through: forensic awareness training among first responders; the professionalisation of CSEs; continued improvements in efficiency and effectiveness at the laboratory with a focus on timeliness and quality; greater forensic literacy among actors in the criminal justice system; appropriate avenues of communication between agencies, practitioners and policymakers in the criminal justice system; and increased allocation of resources to the front end of the forensic process. Originality/value – By adopting a holistic, systemic approach to the analysis of forensic science in the criminal justice system, and identifying inherent risks in the system, this paper contributes to the emerging body of research on the social processes that impact on the effectiveness of forensic science.

Editorial: Statistics and forensic science

Commentary on Guyll et al. (2023): Misuse of Statistical Method Results in Highly Biased Interpretation of Forensic Evidence

[The CSI effect and its impact on the perceptions of forensic science experts' work]

A call for open science in forensics

The evaluation of forensic DNA evidence

Forensic Genetics as a Tool for Forensic Investigation at the Crime Scene

Importance of Forensic Science in Investigation

On Statistical Analysis of Forensic DNA: Theory, Methods and Computer Programs.

Forensic odontology: Wrong convictions, "bad apples" and "the innocence files"

Defence Against the Modern Arts: the Curse of Statistics "Score-based likelihood ratios"

Field-based detection of biological samples for forensic analysis: Established techniques, novel tools, and future innovations

Forens(om)ic medicine: omics in forensic medicine

The role of DNA in forensic science: A comprehensive review

Forensic science as “risky business”: identifying key risk factors in the forensic process from crime scene to court

From Experimental Work to Real Crime Scenes and the Courts

Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward

Demonstrative Evidence and the Use of Algorithms in Jury Trials

Examination of the "CSI Effect" on Perceptions of Scientific and Testimonial Evidence in a Hong Kong Chinese Sample

The Relationship of Forensic Science,Criminal Identification and Judicial Expertise

A forensic science perspective on the role of images in crime investigation and reconstruction

Towards more relevance in forensic science research and development