Abstract:Background: Forensic DNA testing is a powerful tool used to identify, convict, and exonerate individuals charged of criminal offenses, but there are different views on its benefits and risks. Knowledge about public views on forensic DNA testing applied in the criminal field is socially valuable to practitioners and policymakers. This paper aims to synthesize quantitative evidence about the factors that influence public views on forensic DNA testing in the criminal field. Based on a systematic search conducted in January 2019, a scoping review was performed, targeting studies presenting original empirical data that were indexed in Web of Science and PubMed. The two authors performed eligibility and data extraction. Results: The 11 studies were conducted mainly in European countries (Italy, Portugal, Serbia, Spain, Switzerland) and the remaining derived from the USA and New Zealand. Non-representative samples were mostly used to explore the benefits and risks of criminal DNA databases, criteria for insertion and retention of DNA samples and profiles, knowledge, willingness to donate a DNA sample, and custody. The value of forensic DNA databases in protecting society from crime was emphasized. Concerns about improper access to forensic genetic data and risks to civil liberties associated with its uses were expressed. The scarce literature on Forensic DNA Phenotyping and familial searching revealed the same trend of positively valuing forensic DNA testing. Only factors related with socioeconomic position were assessed by more than two studies. Results suggested that public views on forensic DNA testing are influenced by the level of education, age, and exposure to law enforcement occupations although not in a straightforward manner. Conclusion: Further empirical research should assess standardized factors related with social and structural levels (e.g., scientific literacy, public trust in the justice system and concerns about victimization or police activity) and be performed in different national jurisdictions to enable generalization and comparison of findings. It is needed to expand empirical studies on public views about the commercialization of forensic science and the use of recent controversial techniques and new transparency and accountability models.

A review of likelihood ratios in forensic science based on a critique of Stiffelman "No longer the Gold standard: Probabilistic genotyping is changing the nature of DNA evidence in criminal trials"

On the limitations of probabilistic claims about the probative value of mixed DNA profile evidence

Juror understanding of the weight of evidence presented as a likelihood ratio and the impact on the deliberative process: a response to Buckleton, et al.

Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model

Extending the discussion on inconsistency in forensic decisions and results

On forensic likelihood ratios from low-coverage sequencing

Logical implications of applying the principles of population genetics to the interpretation of DNA profiling evidence

Calculation of forensic likelihood ratios: Use of Monte Carlo simulations to compare the output of score-based approaches with true likelihood-ratio values

Low LRs obtained from DNA mixtures: On calibration and discrimination performance of probabilistic genotyping software

A tale of two PG systems: A comparison of the two most widely used continuous probabilistic genotyping systems in the United States

Defence Against the Modern Arts: the Curse of Statistics "Score-based likelihood ratios"

Likelihood Ratios for physical traits in forensic investigations

Likelihood Ratio as Weight of Forensic Evidence: A Metrological Perspective

Calculating the Likelihood Ratio for Multiple Pieces of Evidence

A response to: "NIST experts urge caution in use of courtroom evidence presentation method"

Paternity testing and other inference about relationships from DNA mixtures

Non parametric Bayesian approach to LR assessment in case of rare haplotype match

Evidential strength of categorical expert witness statements

Evidentiary evaluation of single cells renders highly informative forensic comparisons across multifarious admixtures

Interpreting forensic DNA mixtures: allowing for uncertainty in population substructure and dependence

What influences public views on forensic DNA testing in the criminal field? A scoping review of quantitative evidence