Abstract:In mammals, most cells in the brain and peripheral tissues generate circadian (∼24 h) rhythms autonomously. These self-sustained rhythms are coordinated and entrained by a master circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Within the SCN, the individual rhythms of each neuron are synchronized through intercellular signaling. One important feature of SCN is that the synchronized period is close to the population mean of cells' intrinsic periods. In this way, the synchronized period of the SCN stays close to the periods of cells in peripheral tissues. This is important because the SCN must entrain cells throughout the body. However, the mechanism that drives the period of the coupled SCN cells to the population mean is not known. We use mathematical modeling and analysis to show that the mechanism of transcription repression in the intracellular feedback loop plays a pivotal role in regulating the coupled period. Specifically, we use phase response curve analysis to show that the coupled period within the SCN stays near the population mean if transcriptional repression occurs via protein sequestration. In contrast, the coupled period is far from the mean if repression occurs through highly nonlinear Hill-type regulation (e.g., oligomer- or phosphorylation-based repression), as widely assumed in previous mathematical models. Furthermore, we find that the timescale of intercellular coupling needs to be fast compared to that of intracellular feedback to maintain the mean period. These findings reveal the important relationship between the intracellular transcriptional feedback loop and intercellular coupling. This relationship explains why transcriptional repression appears to occur via protein sequestration in multicellular organisms, mammals, and Drosophila, in contrast with the phosphorylation-based repression in unicellular organisms and syncytia. That is, transition to protein sequestration is essential for synchronizing multiple cells with a period close to the population mean (∼24 h).

Protein sequestration versus Hill-type repression in circadian clock models

Simple post-translational circadian clock models from selective sequestration

Molecular Mechanisms that Regulate the Coupled Period of the Mammalian Circadian Clock

The Function, Regulation, and Mechanism of Protein Turnover in Circadian Systems in Neurospora and Other Species

Circadian period is compensated for repressor protein turnover rates in single cells

Modelling the effect of phosphorylation on the circadian clock of Drosophila

Distinguishing Feedback Mechanisms in Clock Models

Modeling the Mammalian Circadian Clock with Transcriptional Feedback Loops and Camp Signaling

Tuning the mammalian circadian clock: robust synergy of two loops

The role of spatiotemporal organization and dynamics of clock complexes in circadian regulation

Camp-Regulated Dynamics of the Mammalian Circadian Clock

A computational model clarifies the roles of positive and negative feedback loops in the Drosophila circadian clock

Reversible phosphorylation subserves robust circadian rhythms by creating a switch in inactivating the positive element.

Modeling the Effects of Cell Cycle M-phase Transcriptional Inhibition on Circadian Oscillation.

Clocks not winding down: unravelling circadian networks

Coupling of a core post-translational pacemaker to a slave transcription/translation feedback loop in a circadian system.

Disordered clock protein interactions and charge blocks turn an hourglass into a persistent circadian oscillator

A New Mammalian Circadian Oscillator Model Including the Camp Module

Waveforms of molecular oscillations reveal circadian timekeeping mechanisms

Mechanisms of noise-resistance in genetic oscillators

Statistical mechanics of clock gene networks underlying circadian rhythms