Abstract:In mammals, most cells in the brain and peripheral tissues generate circadian (∼24 h) rhythms autonomously. These self-sustained rhythms are coordinated and entrained by a master circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Within the SCN, the individual rhythms of each neuron are synchronized through intercellular signaling. One important feature of SCN is that the synchronized period is close to the population mean of cells' intrinsic periods. In this way, the synchronized period of the SCN stays close to the periods of cells in peripheral tissues. This is important because the SCN must entrain cells throughout the body. However, the mechanism that drives the period of the coupled SCN cells to the population mean is not known. We use mathematical modeling and analysis to show that the mechanism of transcription repression in the intracellular feedback loop plays a pivotal role in regulating the coupled period. Specifically, we use phase response curve analysis to show that the coupled period within the SCN stays near the population mean if transcriptional repression occurs via protein sequestration. In contrast, the coupled period is far from the mean if repression occurs through highly nonlinear Hill-type regulation (e.g., oligomer- or phosphorylation-based repression), as widely assumed in previous mathematical models. Furthermore, we find that the timescale of intercellular coupling needs to be fast compared to that of intracellular feedback to maintain the mean period. These findings reveal the important relationship between the intracellular transcriptional feedback loop and intercellular coupling. This relationship explains why transcriptional repression appears to occur via protein sequestration in multicellular organisms, mammals, and Drosophila, in contrast with the phosphorylation-based repression in unicellular organisms and syncytia. That is, transition to protein sequestration is essential for synchronizing multiple cells with a period close to the population mean (∼24 h).

Molecular Mechanisms that Regulate the Coupled Period of the Mammalian Circadian Clock

Tuning the mammalian circadian clock: robust synergy of two loops

Protein sequestration versus Hill-type repression in circadian clock models

Genetic and epigeneticregulations of mammalian circadian rhythms.

Molecular mechanisms of the circadian clockwork in mammals

Modeling the Effects of Cell Cycle M-phase Transcriptional Inhibition on Circadian Oscillation.

Circadian period is compensated for repressor protein turnover rates in single cells

An Intensity Ratio of Interlocking Loops Determines Circadian Period Length.

Camp-Regulated Dynamics of the Mammalian Circadian Clock

Transcriptional Control of Circadian Rhythms and Metabolism: A Matter of Time and Space.

Transcriptional architecture of the mammalian circadian clock

Coordination of circadian timing in mammals

Dynamic modulation of genomic enhancer elements in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, the site of the mammalian circadian clock

Intercellular coupling confers robustness against mutations in the SCN circadian clock network.

Synergistic Interactions between the Molecular and Neuronal Circadian Networks Drive Robust Behavioral Circadian Rhythms in Drosophila melanogaster

Coupling of a core post-translational pacemaker to a slave transcription/translation feedback loop in a circadian system.

Simple post-translational circadian clock models from selective sequestration

Molecular mechanisms and physiological importance of circadian rhythms

The role of spatiotemporal organization and dynamics of clock complexes in circadian regulation

Circadian Control of Global Transcription

Coupling-induced synchronization in multicellular circadian oscillators of mammals