Abstract:In mammals, most cells in the brain and peripheral tissues generate circadian (∼24 h) rhythms autonomously. These self-sustained rhythms are coordinated and entrained by a master circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Within the SCN, the individual rhythms of each neuron are synchronized through intercellular signaling. One important feature of SCN is that the synchronized period is close to the population mean of cells' intrinsic periods. In this way, the synchronized period of the SCN stays close to the periods of cells in peripheral tissues. This is important because the SCN must entrain cells throughout the body. However, the mechanism that drives the period of the coupled SCN cells to the population mean is not known. We use mathematical modeling and analysis to show that the mechanism of transcription repression in the intracellular feedback loop plays a pivotal role in regulating the coupled period. Specifically, we use phase response curve analysis to show that the coupled period within the SCN stays near the population mean if transcriptional repression occurs via protein sequestration. In contrast, the coupled period is far from the mean if repression occurs through highly nonlinear Hill-type regulation (e.g., oligomer- or phosphorylation-based repression), as widely assumed in previous mathematical models. Furthermore, we find that the timescale of intercellular coupling needs to be fast compared to that of intracellular feedback to maintain the mean period. These findings reveal the important relationship between the intracellular transcriptional feedback loop and intercellular coupling. This relationship explains why transcriptional repression appears to occur via protein sequestration in multicellular organisms, mammals, and Drosophila, in contrast with the phosphorylation-based repression in unicellular organisms and syncytia. That is, transition to protein sequestration is essential for synchronizing multiple cells with a period close to the population mean (∼24 h).

Circadian period is compensated for repressor protein turnover rates in single cells

CRYPTOCHROMES confer robustness, not rhythmicity, to circadian timekeeping

Tuning the mammalian circadian clock: robust synergy of two loops

Molecular Mechanisms that Regulate the Coupled Period of the Mammalian Circadian Clock

Circadian regulation of macromolecular complex turnover and proteome renewal

Mammalian Circadian Period, But Not Phase and Amplitude, Is Robust Against Redox and Metabolic Perturbations

Author Correction: Decoupling PER phosphorylation, stability and rhythmic expression from circadian clock function by abolishing PER-CK1 interaction

Endogenous circadian reporters reveal functional differences of PERIOD paralogs and the significance of PERIOD:CK1 stable interaction

Phosphorylation Regulating the Ratio of Intracellular CRY1 Protein Determines the Circadian Period

An Intensity Ratio of Interlocking Loops Determines Circadian Period Length.

Circadian clocks are modulated by compartmentalized oscillating translation

Intercellular coupling confers robustness against mutations in the SCN circadian clock network.

Decoupling PER phosphorylation, stability and rhythmic expression from circadian clock function by abolishing PER-CK1 interaction

Simple post-translational circadian clock models from selective sequestration

Multitissue Circadian Proteome Atlas of WT and Per1-/-/Per2-/- Mice

Camp-Regulated Dynamics of the Mammalian Circadian Clock

Waveforms of molecular oscillations reveal circadian timekeeping mechanisms

Theory of Circadian Metabolism

Mammalian circadian clock proteins form dynamic interacting microbodies distinct from phase separation

Circadian PERIOD proteins sculpt the mammalian alternative splicing landscape

Circadian control of oscillations in mitochondrial rate-limiting enzymes and nutrient utilization by PERIOD proteins