Abstract:In mammals, most cells in the brain and peripheral tissues generate circadian (∼24 h) rhythms autonomously. These self-sustained rhythms are coordinated and entrained by a master circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Within the SCN, the individual rhythms of each neuron are synchronized through intercellular signaling. One important feature of SCN is that the synchronized period is close to the population mean of cells' intrinsic periods. In this way, the synchronized period of the SCN stays close to the periods of cells in peripheral tissues. This is important because the SCN must entrain cells throughout the body. However, the mechanism that drives the period of the coupled SCN cells to the population mean is not known. We use mathematical modeling and analysis to show that the mechanism of transcription repression in the intracellular feedback loop plays a pivotal role in regulating the coupled period. Specifically, we use phase response curve analysis to show that the coupled period within the SCN stays near the population mean if transcriptional repression occurs via protein sequestration. In contrast, the coupled period is far from the mean if repression occurs through highly nonlinear Hill-type regulation (e.g., oligomer- or phosphorylation-based repression), as widely assumed in previous mathematical models. Furthermore, we find that the timescale of intercellular coupling needs to be fast compared to that of intracellular feedback to maintain the mean period. These findings reveal the important relationship between the intracellular transcriptional feedback loop and intercellular coupling. This relationship explains why transcriptional repression appears to occur via protein sequestration in multicellular organisms, mammals, and Drosophila, in contrast with the phosphorylation-based repression in unicellular organisms and syncytia. That is, transition to protein sequestration is essential for synchronizing multiple cells with a period close to the population mean (∼24 h).

Modeling the Mammalian Circadian Clock with Transcriptional Feedback Loops and Camp Signaling

Tuning the mammalian circadian clock: robust synergy of two loops

A Mathematical Model to Characterize the Role of Light Adaptation in Mammalian Circadian Clock

Mathematical modeling of an oscillating gene circuit to unravel the circadian clock network of Arabidopsis thaliana

Simple post-translational circadian clock models from selective sequestration

Modeling the Effects of Cell Cycle M-phase Transcriptional Inhibition on Circadian Oscillation.

Molecular Mechanisms that Regulate the Coupled Period of the Mammalian Circadian Clock

Circadian Transcription Factors Tune the Global Rhythm of Mam-mals

Computational modeling establishes mechanotransduction as a potent modulatory cue for the mammalian circadian clock

A model of calcium-mediated coupling between membrane activity and clock gene expression in neurons of the suprachiasmatic nucleus

Computational modeling establishes mechanotransduction as a potent modulator of the mammalian circadian clock

Transcriptional architecture of the mammalian circadian clock

A Novel Loop: Mutual Regulation Between Epigenetic Modification and the Circadian Clock

Promoter methylation in a mixed feedback loop circadian clock model

Coupling-induced synchronization in multicellular circadian oscillators of mammals

The role of spatiotemporal organization and dynamics of clock complexes in circadian regulation

Circadian Control of Global Transcription

Distinguishing Feedback Mechanisms in Clock Models

Protein sequestration versus Hill-type repression in circadian clock models

Circadian clocks are modulated by compartmentalized oscillating translation

Inputs and Outputs of the Mammalian Circadian Clock