Abstract:In mammals, most cells in the brain and peripheral tissues generate circadian (∼24 h) rhythms autonomously. These self-sustained rhythms are coordinated and entrained by a master circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Within the SCN, the individual rhythms of each neuron are synchronized through intercellular signaling. One important feature of SCN is that the synchronized period is close to the population mean of cells' intrinsic periods. In this way, the synchronized period of the SCN stays close to the periods of cells in peripheral tissues. This is important because the SCN must entrain cells throughout the body. However, the mechanism that drives the period of the coupled SCN cells to the population mean is not known. We use mathematical modeling and analysis to show that the mechanism of transcription repression in the intracellular feedback loop plays a pivotal role in regulating the coupled period. Specifically, we use phase response curve analysis to show that the coupled period within the SCN stays near the population mean if transcriptional repression occurs via protein sequestration. In contrast, the coupled period is far from the mean if repression occurs through highly nonlinear Hill-type regulation (e.g., oligomer- or phosphorylation-based repression), as widely assumed in previous mathematical models. Furthermore, we find that the timescale of intercellular coupling needs to be fast compared to that of intracellular feedback to maintain the mean period. These findings reveal the important relationship between the intracellular transcriptional feedback loop and intercellular coupling. This relationship explains why transcriptional repression appears to occur via protein sequestration in multicellular organisms, mammals, and Drosophila, in contrast with the phosphorylation-based repression in unicellular organisms and syncytia. That is, transition to protein sequestration is essential for synchronizing multiple cells with a period close to the population mean (∼24 h).

A model of calcium-mediated coupling between membrane activity and clock gene expression in neurons of the suprachiasmatic nucleus

Modeling the Mammalian Circadian Clock with Transcriptional Feedback Loops and Camp Signaling

Network-driven intracellular cAMP coordinates circadian rhythm in the suprachiasmatic nucleus

How Coupling Determines the Entrainment of Circadian Clocks

Coupling-induced synchronization in multicellular circadian oscillators of mammals

Cellular Coupling Determines Scale-Invariant Behavior of Neurons in Suprachiasmatic Nucleus.

System-level time computation and representation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus revealed by large-scale calcium imaging and machine learning

Camp-Regulated Dynamics of the Mammalian Circadian Clock

Microfluidic Approach for Modeling Coupled Circadian Clock

Tuning the mammalian circadian clock: robust synergy of two loops

CaMKII is essential for the cellular clock and coupling between morning and evening behavioral rhythms

Dynamic modulation of genomic enhancer elements in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, the site of the mammalian circadian clock

Molecular Mechanisms that Regulate the Coupled Period of the Mammalian Circadian Clock

The Functional Connectome Mediating Circadian Synchrony in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus

Can the clocks tick together despite the noise? Stochastic simulations and analysis

Quantitative Analysis of Phase Wave of Gene Expression in the Mammalian Central Circadian Clock Network

A Microfluidic Approach for Experimentally Modelling the Intercellular Coupling System of a Mammalian Circadian Clock at Single-Cell Level.

Simple post-translational circadian clock models from selective sequestration

A Coupled Stochastic Model Explains Differences in Circadian Behavior of Cry1 and Cry2 Knockouts

Inputs and Outputs of the Mammalian Circadian Clock

Adaptive coupling between neurons widens the entrainment range of the suprachiasmatic nucleus