Abstract:In mammals, most cells in the brain and peripheral tissues generate circadian (∼24 h) rhythms autonomously. These self-sustained rhythms are coordinated and entrained by a master circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Within the SCN, the individual rhythms of each neuron are synchronized through intercellular signaling. One important feature of SCN is that the synchronized period is close to the population mean of cells' intrinsic periods. In this way, the synchronized period of the SCN stays close to the periods of cells in peripheral tissues. This is important because the SCN must entrain cells throughout the body. However, the mechanism that drives the period of the coupled SCN cells to the population mean is not known. We use mathematical modeling and analysis to show that the mechanism of transcription repression in the intracellular feedback loop plays a pivotal role in regulating the coupled period. Specifically, we use phase response curve analysis to show that the coupled period within the SCN stays near the population mean if transcriptional repression occurs via protein sequestration. In contrast, the coupled period is far from the mean if repression occurs through highly nonlinear Hill-type regulation (e.g., oligomer- or phosphorylation-based repression), as widely assumed in previous mathematical models. Furthermore, we find that the timescale of intercellular coupling needs to be fast compared to that of intracellular feedback to maintain the mean period. These findings reveal the important relationship between the intracellular transcriptional feedback loop and intercellular coupling. This relationship explains why transcriptional repression appears to occur via protein sequestration in multicellular organisms, mammals, and Drosophila, in contrast with the phosphorylation-based repression in unicellular organisms and syncytia. That is, transition to protein sequestration is essential for synchronizing multiple cells with a period close to the population mean (∼24 h).

Promoter methylation in a mixed feedback loop circadian clock model

Tuning the mammalian circadian clock: robust synergy of two loops

Simple post-translational circadian clock models from selective sequestration

A Novel Loop: Mutual Regulation Between Epigenetic Modification and the Circadian Clock

Modeling the Effects of Cell Cycle M-phase Transcriptional Inhibition on Circadian Oscillation.

Molecular Mechanisms that Regulate the Coupled Period of the Mammalian Circadian Clock

Model integration of circadian- and sleep-wake-driven contributions to rhythmic gene expression reveals distinct regulatory principles

A REVISED MODE OF DROSOPHILA CIRCADIAN REGULATION NETWORK

Computational modeling establishes mechanotransduction as a potent modulatory cue for the mammalian circadian clock

Computational modeling establishes mechanotransduction as a potent modulator of the mammalian circadian clock

Phosphorylation of DNA-binding domains of CLOCK-BMAL1 complex for PER-dependent inhibition in circadian clock of mammalian cells

Protein sequestration versus Hill-type repression in circadian clock models

Mathematical modeling of an oscillating gene circuit to unravel the circadian clock network of Arabidopsis thaliana

Circadian period is compensated for repressor protein turnover rates in single cells

Distinguishing Feedback Mechanisms in Clock Models

Computational modeling of protein interactions and phosphoform kinetics in the KaiABC cyanobacterial circadian clock

Circadian regulation of stereotypic chromatin conformations at enhancers

Transcription factor activity rhythms and tissue-specific chromatin interactions explain circadian gene expression across organs

A Hybrid HMM Approach for the Dynamics of DNA Methylation

Reversible phosphorylation subserves robust circadian rhythms by creating a switch in inactivating the positive element.

Phase response curves of a molecular model oscillator: implications for mutual coupling of paired oscillators