Abstract:In mammals, most cells in the brain and peripheral tissues generate circadian (∼24 h) rhythms autonomously. These self-sustained rhythms are coordinated and entrained by a master circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Within the SCN, the individual rhythms of each neuron are synchronized through intercellular signaling. One important feature of SCN is that the synchronized period is close to the population mean of cells' intrinsic periods. In this way, the synchronized period of the SCN stays close to the periods of cells in peripheral tissues. This is important because the SCN must entrain cells throughout the body. However, the mechanism that drives the period of the coupled SCN cells to the population mean is not known. We use mathematical modeling and analysis to show that the mechanism of transcription repression in the intracellular feedback loop plays a pivotal role in regulating the coupled period. Specifically, we use phase response curve analysis to show that the coupled period within the SCN stays near the population mean if transcriptional repression occurs via protein sequestration. In contrast, the coupled period is far from the mean if repression occurs through highly nonlinear Hill-type regulation (e.g., oligomer- or phosphorylation-based repression), as widely assumed in previous mathematical models. Furthermore, we find that the timescale of intercellular coupling needs to be fast compared to that of intracellular feedback to maintain the mean period. These findings reveal the important relationship between the intracellular transcriptional feedback loop and intercellular coupling. This relationship explains why transcriptional repression appears to occur via protein sequestration in multicellular organisms, mammals, and Drosophila, in contrast with the phosphorylation-based repression in unicellular organisms and syncytia. That is, transition to protein sequestration is essential for synchronizing multiple cells with a period close to the population mean (∼24 h).

Coupling of a core post-translational pacemaker to a slave transcription/translation feedback loop in a circadian system.

Simple post-translational circadian clock models from selective sequestration

Synchronization of the circadian clock to the environment tracked in real time

Tuning the mammalian circadian clock: robust synergy of two loops

Camp-Regulated Dynamics of the Mammalian Circadian Clock

Robust Circadian Oscillations in Growing Cyanobacteria Require Transcriptional Feedback

Structure, function, and mechanism of the core circadian clock in cyanobacteria

Modeling the Mammalian Circadian Clock with Transcriptional Feedback Loops and Camp Signaling

Reversible phosphorylation subserves robust circadian rhythms by creating a switch in inactivating the positive element.

A thermodynamically consistent model of the post-translational Kai circadian clock

Elucidating The Ticking Of An In Vitro Circadian Clockwork

Molecular Mechanisms that Regulate the Coupled Period of the Mammalian Circadian Clock

Computational modeling of protein interactions and phosphoform kinetics in the KaiABC cyanobacterial circadian clock

Single-molecular and Ensemble-level Oscillations of Cyanobacterial Circadian Clock

An Undiscovered Circadian Clock to Regulate Phytoplankton Photosynthesis

From primordial clocks to circadian oscillators

Mechanism of Robust Circadian Oscillation of KaiC Phosphorylation In Vitro

Circadian Rhythms of Superhelical Status of DNA in Cyanobacteria.

Two KaiABC systems control circadian oscillations in one cyanobacterium

The Function, Regulation, and Mechanism of Protein Turnover in Circadian Systems in Neurospora and Other Species

Circadian clocks are modulated by compartmentalized oscillating translation