Abstract:The circadian clock is accountable for the regulation of internal rhythms in most living organisms. It allows the anticipation of environmental changes during the day and a better adaptation of physiological processes. In mammals the main clock is located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and synchronizes secondary clocks throughout the body. Its molecular constituents form an intracellular network which dictates circadian time and regulates clock-controlled genes. These clock-controlled genes are involved in crucial biological processes including metabolism and cell cycle regulation. Its malfunction can lead to disruption of biological rhythms and cause severe damage to the organism. The detailed mechanisms that govern the circadian system are not yet completely understood. Mathematical models can be of great help to exploit the mechanism of the circadian circuitry. We built a mathematical model for the core clock system using available data on phases and amplitudes of clock components obtained from an extensive literature search. This model was used to answer complex questions for example: how does the degradation rate of Per affect the period of the system and what is the role of the ROR/Bmal/REV-ERB (RBR) loop? Our findings indicate that an increase in the RNA degradation rate of the clock gene Period (Per) can contribute to increase or decrease of the period--a consequence of a non-monotonic effect of Per transcript stability on the circadian period identified by our model. Furthermore, we provide theoretical evidence for a potential role of the RBR loop as an independent oscillator. We carried out overexpression experiments on members of the RBR loop which lead to loss of oscillations consistent with our predictions. These findings challenge the role of the RBR loop as a merely auxiliary loop and might change our view of the clock molecular circuitry and of the function of the nuclear receptors (REV-ERB and ROR) as a putative driving force of molecular oscillations.

A computational model clarifies the roles of positive and negative feedback loops in the Drosophila circadian clock

Camp-Regulated Dynamics of the Mammalian Circadian Clock

Simulation of Drosophila Circadian Oscillations, Mutations, and Light Responses by a Model with VRI, PDP-1, and CLK

Modelling the effect of phosphorylation on the circadian clock of Drosophila

Modeling the Mammalian Circadian Clock with Transcriptional Feedback Loops and Camp Signaling

Digital clocks: simple Boolean models can quantitatively describe circadian systems

The Trade-Off Mechanism in Mammalian Circadian Clock Model with Two Time Delays

Light-modulated dynamics in a novel mammalian circadian oscillator model

A REVISED MODE OF DROSOPHILA CIRCADIAN REGULATION NETWORK

Reversible phosphorylation subserves robust circadian rhythms by creating a switch in inactivating the positive element.

Modelling of Intercellular Synchronization in the Drosophila Circadian Clock

Synergistic Interactions between the Molecular and Neuronal Circadian Networks Drive Robust Behavioral Circadian Rhythms in Drosophila melanogaster

Circadian Modulation Of Light-Induced Locomotion Responses In Drosophila Melanogaster

Tuning the mammalian circadian clock: robust synergy of two loops

Simple post-translational circadian clock models from selective sequestration

A New Mammalian Circadian Oscillator Model Including the Camp Module

Distinguishing Feedback Mechanisms in Clock Models

Modeling Transcriptional Co-Regulation of Mammalian Circadian Clock

Circadian neuron feedback controls the Drosophila sleep–activity profile

Neurotransmitter-mediated collective rhythms in grouped Drosophila circadian clocks.

A Mathematical Model to Characterize the Role of Light Adaptation in Mammalian Circadian Clock