Abstract:Traditional 2D flow MRI, which measures unidirectional velocity in one plane, is the current standard for assessing blood flow in the heart and great vessels. 4D flow MRI uses diaphragmatic navigators for correction of respiratory movements providing a 3D volume and allowing flow analysis in virtually all vessels, potentially with higher reliability than 2D flow, particularly in complex and turbulent flow. The recently introduced 5D flow MRI allows the acquisition of the 3D volume without the need of ECG gating and respiratory navigation (free running). Both 4D and 5D techniques show potential to replace 2D flow MRI in the future, offering shorter and predictable scan times in addition to an improved accuracy. AA, Ascending Aorta; LA, Left Atrium; LV, Left Ventricle; RV, Right Ventricle. Aim Two‐dimensional phase‐contrast magnetic resonance imaging (2D flow MRI) and its multidimensional alternatives, 4D and 5D flow MRI, measure blood flow in the heart and great vessels. While 2D flow MRI is the standard technique, it has limitations regarding need for precise image plane prescribing and long scan time. In contrast, 4D and 5D flow MRI acquire 3D volumes, enabling retrospective assessment of all vessels. This review evaluates these three techniques for quantification of blood flow of the aortic and pulmonary valves in congenital heart disease. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in August 2024 using the PUBMED database, including articles comparing 2D, 4D, and 5D flow MRI. Results Fifteen articles comparing 2D and 4D, one comparing 2D and 5D and three articles comparing 4D and 5D flow MRI were included. No study compared all three techniques. 2D, 4D and 5D flow MRI demonstrated a good agreement for flow quantification. 4D flow MRI, however, tends to present a better accuracy and internal consistency than 2D flow MRI for determination of peak velocities and flow in stenotic lesions, particularly when comparing velocities to echocardiography. 4D and 5D flow MRI are associated with shorter scan times than 2D flow MRI. Conclusions 4D and 5D flow MRI appear to offer promising alternatives to 2D flow MRI with the advantage of reduced scan times. Larger and prospective studies including echocardiography are needed to evaluate the potential of 4D and 5D to replace 2D flow MRI for flow quantification and peak velocity determination.

4D-Flow MRI and Vector Ultrasound in the In-Vitro Evaluation of Surgical Aortic Heart Valves – a Pilot Study

Four-Dimensional Flow MRI for the Evaluation of Aortic Endovascular Graft: A Pilot Study

Advancing aortic stenosis assessment: validation of fluid-structure interaction models against 4D flow MRI data

Quantitative Hemodynamics in Aortic Dissection: Comparing in Vitro MRI with FSI Simulation in a Compliant Model

Investigation of hemodynamic bulk flow patterns caused by aortic stenosis using a combined 4D Flow MRI-CFD framework

Hemodynamics in a three-dimensional printed aortic model: a comparison of four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance and image-based computational fluid dynamics

The Role of 2, 4, and 5‐dimensional Cardiac Flow MRI for Evaluation of Valvulopathies: A Literature Review

Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Are We Able to Improve Hemodynamic Outcome?

Validation of the Reduced Unified Continuum Formulation Against In Vitro 4D-Flow MRI

In Vivo Three-Dimensional Geometric Reconstruction of the Mouse Aortic Heart Valve

Automated Quantification of Simple and Complex Aortic Flow Using 2D Phase Contrast MRI

Super-resolution 4D flow MRI to quantify aortic regurgitation using computational fluid dynamics and deep learning

High-Frame-Rate Ultrasound Velocimetry in the Healthy Femoral Bifurcation: A Comparative Study Against 4-D Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Hemodynamic Aspects of Vessel Wall Imaging: 4D Flow

Verification Study of in Silico Computed Intracardiac Blood Flow With 4D Flow MRI

Impact of sequence type and field strength (1.5, 3, and 7T) on 4D flow MRI hemodynamic aortic parameters in healthy volunteers

In vitro investigation of the blood flow downstream of a 3D-printed aortic valve

Comparison of Immersed Boundary Simulations of Heart Valve Hemodynamics against In Vitro 4D Flow MRI Data

Fully Automated Valve Segmentation for Blood Flow Assessment From 4D Flow MRI Including Automated Cardiac Valve Tracking and Transvalvular Velocity Mapping

Validation of 2D flow MRI for helical and vortical flows

Clinical Applications of 4D Flow MR Imaging in Aortic Valvular and Congenital Heart Disease