Abstract:Purpose: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and 4D-flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are synergically used for the simulation and the analysis of the flow in a patient-specific geometry of a healthy thoracic aorta. Methods: CFD simulations are carried out through the open-source code SimVascular. The MRI data are used, first, to provide patient-specific boundary conditions. In particular, the experimentally acquired flow rate waveform is imposed at the inlet, while at the outlets the RCR parameters of the Windkessel model are tuned in order to match the experimentally measured fractions of flow rate exiting each domain outlet during an entire cardiac cycle. Then, the MRI data are used to validate the results of the hemodynamic simulations. As expected, with a rigid-wall model the computed flow rate waveforms at the outlets do not show the time lag respect to the inlet waveform conversely found in MRI data. We therefore evaluate the effect of wall compliance by using a linear elastic model with homogeneous and isotropic properties and changing the value of the Young's modulus. A stochastic analysis based on the polynomial chaos approach is adopted, which allows continuous response surfaces to be obtained in the parameter space starting from a few deterministic simulations. Results: The flow rate waveform can be accurately reproduced by the compliant simulations in the ascending aorta; on the other hand, in the aortic arch and in the descending aorta, the experimental time delay can be matched with low values of the Young's modulus, close to the average value estimated from experiments. However, by decreasing the Young's modulus the underestimation of the peak flow rate becomes more significant. As for the velocity maps, we found a generally good qualitative agreement of simulations with MRI data. The main difference is that the simulations overestimate the extent of reverse flow regions or predict reverse flow when it is absent in the experimental data. Finally, a significant sensitivity to wall compliance of instantaneous shear stresses during large part of the cardiac cycle period is observed; the variability of the time-averaged wall shear stresses remains however very low. Conclusions: In summary, a successful integration of hemodynamic simulations and of MRI data for a patient-specific simulation has been shown. The wall compliance seems to have a significant impact on the numerical predictions; a larger wall elasticity generally improves the agreement with experimental data.

Verification Study of in Silico Computed Intracardiac Blood Flow With 4D Flow MRI

Patient Specific Hemodynamics: Combined 4d Flow-Sensitive Mri And Cfd

Comparison of Immersed Boundary Simulations of Heart Valve Hemodynamics against In Vitro 4D Flow MRI Data

Intra-ventricular Blood Flow Simulation with Patient Specific Geometry

Computational modeling of left ventricular flow using PC–CMR–derived four–dimensional wall motion

Validation of the Reduced Unified Continuum Formulation Against In Vitro 4D-Flow MRI

Hemodynamic Assessment of Structural Heart Disease Using 4D Flow MRI: How We Do It

Validation of Numerical Simulations of Thoracic Aorta Hemodynamics: Comparison with In Vivo Measurements and Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis

Subject-specific computational simulation of left ventricular flow based on magnetic resonance imaging.

Progress Towards Patient-Specific Computational Flow Modeling of the Left Heart via Combination of Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Computational Fluid Dynamics

Intra-Cardiac Flow from Geometry Prescribed Computational Fluid Dynamics: Comparison with Ultrasound Vector Flow Imaging

Abstract 235: Integration of Patient-specific Computational Hemodynamics and Vessel Wall Shear Stress into MRI Diagnosis of Vascular Diseases

Validation of 2D flow MRI for helical and vortical flows

Integration of Patient-specific Computational Hemodynamics and Vessel Wall Shear Stress Into MRI Diagnosis of Vascular Diseases

Coronary Flow Assessment Using Accelerated 4D Flow MRI With Respiratory Motion Correction

Blood Flow Simulation, Patient-Specificin-vivo

Computational Fluid Dynamic Assessment of Patients with Congenital Heart Disease from 3D Rotational Angiography

Comparison of intracranial aneurysm flow quantification techniques: standard PIV vs stereoscopic PIV vs tomographic PIV vs phase-contrast MRI vs CFD

Combined CFD/MRI Analysis of Left Ventricular Flow

The impact of 4D-Flow MRI spatial resolution on patient-specific CFD simulations of the thoracic aorta

Hemodynamics in a three-dimensional printed aortic model: a comparison of four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance and image-based computational fluid dynamics