Fully Automated Valve Segmentation for Blood Flow Assessment From 4D Flow MRI Including Automated Cardiac Valve Tracking and Transvalvular Velocity Mapping

Thomas in de Braekt,Jean‐Paul Aben,Marc Maussen,Harrie C.M. van den Bosch,Patrick Houthuizen,Arno A.W. Roest,Pieter J. van den Boogaard,Hildo J. Lamb,Jos J.M. Westenberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29370
IF: 4.4
2024-04-03
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:Background Automated 4D flow MRI valvular flow quantification without time‐consuming manual segmentation might improve workflow. Purpose Compare automated valve segmentation (AS) to manual (MS), and manually corrected automated segmentation (AMS), in corrected atrioventricular septum defect (c‐AVSD) patients and healthy volunteers, for assessing net forward volume (NFV) and regurgitation fraction (RF). Study Type Retrospective. Population 27 c‐AVSD patients (median, 23 years; interquartile range, 16–31 years) and 24 healthy volunteers (25 years; 12.5–36.5 years). Field strength/Sequence Whole‐heart 4D flow MRI and cine steady‐state free precession at 3T. Assessment After automatic valve tracking, valve annuli were segmented on time‐resolved reformatted trans‐valvular velocity images by AS, MS, and AMS. NFV was calculated for all valves, and RF for right and left atrioventricular valves (RAVV and LAVV). NFV variation (standard deviation divided by mean NFV) and NFV differences (NFV difference of a valve vs. mean NFV of other valves) expressed internal NFV consistency. Statistical Tests Comparisons between methods were assessed by Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests, and intra/interobserver variability by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). P
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?