Abstract:Abstract Aims To compare the novel 2D multi-venc and 4D flow acquisitions with the standard 2D flow acquisition for the assessment of paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) after TAVR using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived regurgitant fraction (RF). Methods and results In this prospective study, patients underwent CMR one month after TAVR to assess PVR using 2D multi-venc and 4D flow, in addition to standard 2D flow. Scatterplots and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess correlation and visualize agreement between techniques. Reproducibility of measurements was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients. The study included 21 patients (mean age, 80 years ± 5 [SD], 9 men). Mean RF was 11.7 ± 10.0% using standard 2D flow, 10.6 ± 7.0% using 2D multi-venc flow, and 9.6 ± 7.3% using 4D flow. There was a very strong correlation between the RFs assessed with 2D multi-venc and standard 2D flow (r = 0.88, p < 0.001), and a strong correlation between the RFs assessed with 4D flow and standard 2D flow (r = 0.74, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots revealed no significant bias between the RFs (2D multi-venc: 1.3%; 4D flow: 0.3%). Intra- and interobserver reproducibility for 2D multi-venc flow were 0.98 and 0.97, respectively; and 0.92 and 0.90 for 4D flow, respectively. Conclusion 2D multi-venc and 4D flow produce accurate quantification of PVR after TAVR. The fast acquisition of the 2D multi-venc sequence, and the free-breathing acquisition with retrospective plane selection of the 4D flow sequence provide useful advantages in clinical practice, especially in the frail TAVR population.

Assessment of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using 2D multi-venc and 4D flow CMR