Abstract:Traditional 2D flow MRI, which measures unidirectional velocity in one plane, is the current standard for assessing blood flow in the heart and great vessels. 4D flow MRI uses diaphragmatic navigators for correction of respiratory movements providing a 3D volume and allowing flow analysis in virtually all vessels, potentially with higher reliability than 2D flow, particularly in complex and turbulent flow. The recently introduced 5D flow MRI allows the acquisition of the 3D volume without the need of ECG gating and respiratory navigation (free running). Both 4D and 5D techniques show potential to replace 2D flow MRI in the future, offering shorter and predictable scan times in addition to an improved accuracy. AA, Ascending Aorta; LA, Left Atrium; LV, Left Ventricle; RV, Right Ventricle. Aim Two‐dimensional phase‐contrast magnetic resonance imaging (2D flow MRI) and its multidimensional alternatives, 4D and 5D flow MRI, measure blood flow in the heart and great vessels. While 2D flow MRI is the standard technique, it has limitations regarding need for precise image plane prescribing and long scan time. In contrast, 4D and 5D flow MRI acquire 3D volumes, enabling retrospective assessment of all vessels. This review evaluates these three techniques for quantification of blood flow of the aortic and pulmonary valves in congenital heart disease. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in August 2024 using the PUBMED database, including articles comparing 2D, 4D, and 5D flow MRI. Results Fifteen articles comparing 2D and 4D, one comparing 2D and 5D and three articles comparing 4D and 5D flow MRI were included. No study compared all three techniques. 2D, 4D and 5D flow MRI demonstrated a good agreement for flow quantification. 4D flow MRI, however, tends to present a better accuracy and internal consistency than 2D flow MRI for determination of peak velocities and flow in stenotic lesions, particularly when comparing velocities to echocardiography. 4D and 5D flow MRI are associated with shorter scan times than 2D flow MRI. Conclusions 4D and 5D flow MRI appear to offer promising alternatives to 2D flow MRI with the advantage of reduced scan times. Larger and prospective studies including echocardiography are needed to evaluate the potential of 4D and 5D to replace 2D flow MRI for flow quantification and peak velocity determination.

Hemodynamic Aspects of Vessel Wall Imaging: 4D Flow

The role of 4D flow MRI for clinical applications in cardiovascular disease: current status and future perspectives.

Hemodynamic Assessment of Structural Heart Disease Using 4D Flow MRI: How We Do It

Clinical intra-cardiac 4D flow CMR: acquisition, analysis, and clinical applications

Clinical Applications of 4D Flow MR Imaging in Aortic Valvular and Congenital Heart Disease

Clinical Applications of Four-Dimensional Flow MRI

Optimization of 4D Flow MRI Velocity Field in the Aorta with Divergence-Free Smoothing.

From 2D to 4D Phase‐Contrast MRI in the Neurovascular System: Will It Be a Quantum Jump or a Fancy Decoration?

Hemodynamic Parameters for Cardiovascular System in 4D Flow MRI: Mathematical Definition and Clinical Applications

Advances in machine learning applications for cardiovascular 4D flow MRI

Visualization of hemodynamics in intracranial arteries using time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI

Technical Background for 4D Flow MR Imaging

Revolutionizing vascular imaging: trends and future directions of 4D flow MRI based on a 20-year bibliometric analysis

Why 4D Flow MRI? Real Advantages

4D flow MRI hemodynamic biomarkers for cerebrovascular diseases

The Role of 2, 4, and 5‐dimensional Cardiac Flow MRI for Evaluation of Valvulopathies: A Literature Review

New imaging tools in cardiovascular medicine: computational fluid dynamics and 4D flow MRI

[4D flow MRI: value and clinical perspectives in patients with pathology of the heart and great vessels (part 2): A review]

Rationale and clinical applications of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in assessment of valvular heart disease: a comprehensive review

Medical image based hemodynamic analysis

Editorial for “Traveling Volunteers – A Multi‐Vendor, Multi‐Center Study on Reproducibility and Comparability of 4D Flow Derived Aortic Hemodynamics in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance”