Balloon Flight Background Measurement with Actively-Shielded Planar and Imaging CZT Detectors

P. F. Bloser,T. Narita,J. A. Jenkins,M. Perrin,R. Murray,J. E. Grindlay

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.454226

2001-10-03

Abstract:We present results from the flight of two prototype CZT detectors on a scientific balloon payload in September 2000. The first detector, referred to as ``CZT1,'' consisted of a 10 mm x 10 mm x 2 mm CZT crystal with a single gold planar electrode readout. This detector was shielded by a combination of a passive collimator surrounded by plastic scintillator and a thick BGO crystal in the rear. The second detector, ``CZT2,'' comprised two 10 mm x 10 mm x 5 mm CZT crystals, one made of eV Products high pressure Bridgman material and the other of IMARAD horizontal Bridgman material, each fashioned with a 4 x 4 array of gold pixels on a 2.5 mm pitch. The pixellated detectors were flip-chip-mounted side by side and read out by a 32-channel ASIC. This detector was also shielded by a passive/plastic collimator in the front, but used only additional passive/plastic shielding in the rear. Both experiments were flown from Ft. Sumner, NM on September 19, 2000 on a 24 hour balloon flight. CZT1 recorded a non-vetoed background level at 100 keV of ~1e-3 cts/cm2/s/keV. Raising the BGO threshold from 50 keV to ~1 MeV produced only an 18% increase in this level. CZT2 recorded a background at 100 keV of ~4e-3 cts/cm2/s/keV in the eV Products detector and ~6e-3 cts/cm2/s/keV in the IMARAD detector. Both CZT1 and CZT2 spectra were in basic agreement with Monte Carlo simulations, though both recorded systematically higher count rates at high energy than predicted. No lines were observed, indicating that neutron capture reactions, at least those producing decay lines at a few 100 keV, are not significant components of the CZT background. Comparison of the CZT1 and CZT2 spectra indicates that passive/plastic shielding may provide adequately low background levels for many applications.

Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly focus on the following aspects:

1. **Evaluating the application potential of CZT detectors in high - energy astronomy**: Through actual balloon - flight experiments, verify the performance and background level of CZT (cadmium - zinc - telluride) detectors in the near - space environment. Due to its excellent energy resolution and spatial resolution, CZT detectors have important application prospects in hard X - ray and gamma - ray astronomy.

2. **Testing different shielding techniques**: Research the effects of active shielding (such as BGO crystals) and passive shielding (such as plastic scintillators) on reducing background noise. Specifically, the paper compares two differently configured CZT detectors:
- **CZT1**: A single CZT crystal is used, equipped with a thick BGO crystal as active shielding.
- **CZT2**: Composed of two pixelated CZT detectors, only using passive/plastic shielding.

3. **Verifying the feasibility of the ASIC read - out system**: Especially for pixelated CZT detectors, verify their performance under flight conditions, including energy resolution, photopeak efficiency, and temperature effects, etc.

4. **Investigating the sources of background radiation**: Through experimental data, analyze the main components of background radiation and explore whether they are caused by neutron - capture reactions or other processes. Specifically, the paper explores the following questions:
- Is the neutron - capture reaction an important source of CZT background radiation?
- How much influence do different shielding techniques have on background radiation?

### Main Conclusions

- **Shielding effect**: Active shielding (such as BGO) is more effective than passive shielding, but plastic shielding can also significantly reduce the background level, especially in the high - energy region. This indicates that for some applications, lightweight plastic shielding may be a viable option.

- **Sources of background radiation**: The experimental results did not find obvious decay lines produced by neutron - capture reactions, suggesting that these reactions may not be the main background sources. In addition, simulation results show that cosmic - ray protons and atmospheric gamma - rays may be the main contributors.

- **Detector performance**: The CZT2 experiment verified the feasibility of the ASIC read - out system. Although some pixels of the IMARAD detector cannot be used due to noise problems, the overall performance still meets expectations.

In conclusion, through balloon - flight experiments on CZT detectors, this paper verified their application potential in high - energy astronomy and provided important technical support and theoretical basis for future space missions.