Abstract:Background Respiratory motion management is essential in order to achieve high‐precision radiotherapy. Markerless motion tracking of tumor can provide a non‐invasive way to manage respiratory motion, thereby enhancing treatment accuracy. However, the low contrast in real‐time x‐ray images for image guidance limits the application of markerless tracking. Purpose We present a novel approach based on a motion model to perform markerless tracking of tumor and surrounding tissues even when they have low contrast in real‐time x‐ray images. Methods A proof‐of‐concept validation of the method has been performed using digital and physical phantoms at breathing conditions that are significantly different than the planning stage. A motion model is first constructed by performing principal component analysis (PCA) on the planning 4DCT. During treatment, the motion of a surrogate is tracked and used as the input of the motion model, which generates a 3D real‐time volume estimation. Such 3D estimation is then projected to 2D to create digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs). The relationships between the real‐time DRRs, reference DRRs, and reference x‐ray images are first established to simulate 2D real‐time images from the real‐time volume. The registration between the simulated 2D real‐time images and real‐time x‐ray images corrects the initial motion model estimation to ensure the estimated volume matches the real‐time condition. Results In digital phantom, the Dice index of pancreas was improved from 0.74 to 0.78 after correction using real‐time DRRs in fully inhaled phase. Validation on lung and pancreas is performed in physical phantom with two motion traces. The surrogate‐tumor relationships were intentionally altered to generate large target localization errors due to the differences in body condition between treatment planning stage and during treatment. The real‐time correction for the estimated 3D real‐time volume was performed using a pair of 2D x‐ray images. For the deep breathing motion trace, the tumor localization mean absolute error (MAE) throughout the tracking decreases from around 3 mm to less than 1 mm after correction. For the shallow breathing motion trace with a 1.7 mm baseline shift, the tumor localization MAE throughout the tracking decreases from around 1.5 mm to less than 1 mm after correction. Conclusion The method combines the detailed structural information from planning 4DCT and real‐time information from real‐time x‐ray images through a motion model. The matching between the real‐time model estimation and 2D real‐time images is performed in the same modality so that it can be applied to regions with low contrast in the images. The real‐time images successfully corrected the initial motion model estimations in our proof‐of‐concept validation. This suggests the potential to perform markerless tracking in low‐contrast region using a motion model.

Evaluation of a New Method for CyberKnife Treatment for Central Lung and Mediastinal Tumors by Tracheobronchial Tracking

Automated Clinical Target Volume Delineation Using Deep 3D Neural Networks in Radiation Therapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Fiducial-free Lung Tumor Tracking for CyberKnife Radiosurgery

Influence of Different Image-Guided Tracking Methods Upon the Local Efficacy of Cyberknife Treatment in Lung Tumors

Study on Motion Management of Pancreatic Cancer Treated by CyberKnife

Novel utilization and quantification of Xsight diaphragm tracking for respiratory motion compensation in Cyberknife Synchrony treatment of liver tumors

Application of 4D-CT in CyberKnife for Lung Tumor

Clinical Analysis of Cyberknife Stereotactic Surgery for Lung Tumors

Markerless tracking of tumor and tissues: A motion model approach

MA13.01 Markerless Tumor Tracking During Lung Radiotherapy Using Intrafraction X-Ray Imaging

WE‐DE‐BRA‐11: A Study of Motion Tracking Accuracy of Robotic Radiosurgery Using a Novel CCD Camera Based End‐To‐End Test System

Positioning accuracy of patients with spinal tumors treated with Cyberknife Xsight spine prone tracking mode

Design and Validation of a MV/kV Imaging-Based Markerless Tracking System for Assessing Real-Time Lung Tumor Motion

Quantification of Intrafraction and Interfraction Tumor Motion Amplitude and Prediction Error for Different Liver Tumor Trajectories in Cyberknife Synchrony Tracking

Impacts of Different Tracking Methods on Short-Term Therapeutic Effect of Cyberknife in Treatment of Lung Cancer

Cyberknife Radiotherapy on Dose Distribution of Targets: Effect of Different Treatment Paths on Medical Image Diagnostics.

UT Transform Based Tumor Respiratory Motion Estimation and Prediction for Radiosurgery Robot.

Patient Cranial Angle and Intrafractional Stability in CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery: A Retrospective Analysis

Comparison of Ray Tracing and Monte Carlo Calculation Algorithms for Spine Lesions Treated With CyberKnife

SU‐GG‐T‐529: Pre‐Clinical Evaluation of a 4D Tracking DmMLC‐Based Delivery to Lung Tumor

Assessment of Delivery Quality Assurance for Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Cyberknife