Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Purpose</h3><p>To research the fiducial-based real-time tracking intrafraction (during the fraction, intra-) and interfraction (between fractions, inter-) tumor respiration amplitude, motion trajectory, and prediction error and quantify their relationships for different types of motion trajectories during Cyberknife-based stereotactic ablation radiotherapy.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods and Materials</h3><p>Twelve patients with liver tumors were treated using a Cyberknife system, and fifty-eight fractions were involved in this study. Real-time target motion tracking data were extracted and transformed from the robot coordinate system into the patient coordinate system by the rotation matrix. Only the time sessions of the beam on were studied according to the data info generated from the Cyberknife motion tracking system. The motion correlation model between the external marker signal and internal fiducial position was built to present the type of motion trajectory.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Using the correlation model as a function of external marker signal and internal fiducial position, we knew four motion trajectories mainly existed for liver cancer patients as follows: perfect linearity (Group I), simple linearity (Group II), hysteresis (Group III), and area respiratory (Group IV) patterns. More than half of the patients had a linear breathing trajectory. Analyzing all patients together, the intra-amplitudes were slightly less than those of the inter-amplitudes. The amplitude from large to small was in the S-I, L-R and A-P directions, regardless of inter- and intra-amplitudes. Then, patients with a larger peak-to-peak have a larger SD of amplitude and a larger amplitude in all fractions/sessions. The prediction errors of the linear motion trajectory were generally less than 1 mm. The prediction errors of the regular hysteresis breathing model were smaller than those of the irregular hysteresis model. Scattered breathing would result in a larger tracking error, such as the area respiratory trajectory. It was logical that prediction errors were larger for patients who showed much variation in their breathing amplitude.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>This paper showed that the liver motion trajectory model included perfect linearity, sample linearity, hysteresis and area. The linear motion trajectory presented the minimum tracking error and the best stability, and the hysteresis and area trajectory were the worst. Therefore, breathing management, including respiration training, control and evaluation of motion trajectory in all directions, was significantly necessary during liver SABR treatment.</p>

Influence of Different Image-Guided Tracking Methods Upon the Local Efficacy of Cyberknife Treatment in Lung Tumors

Impacts of Different Tracking Methods on Short-Term Therapeutic Effect of Cyberknife in Treatment of Lung Cancer

Clinical Analysis of Cyberknife Stereotactic Surgery for Lung Tumors

Study on Motion Management of Pancreatic Cancer Treated by CyberKnife

Results and prognostic factors of CyberKnife for lung metastasis

Novel utilization and quantification of Xsight diaphragm tracking for respiratory motion compensation in Cyberknife Synchrony treatment of liver tumors

Fiducial-free Lung Tumor Tracking for CyberKnife Radiosurgery

Clinical outcomes of cyberknife stereotactic radiosurgery for lung metastases.

Positioning accuracy of patients with spinal tumors treated with Cyberknife Xsight spine prone tracking mode

Application of 4D-CT in CyberKnife for Lung Tumor

Preliminary results for patients with early peripheral non-small cell lung cancer treated by Cyberknife

Cyberknife Radiotherapy on Dose Distribution of Targets: Effect of Different Treatment Paths on Medical Image Diagnostics.

Evaluation of a New Method for CyberKnife Treatment for Central Lung and Mediastinal Tumors by Tracheobronchial Tracking

Clinical outcomes of CyberKnife radiosurgery for patients with peripheral stage Ⅰ non-small cell Lung cancer

Clinical Outcomes of CyberKnife Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Peripheral Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The application and influential factors of cyberknife in non-small cell lung cancer

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Using the CyberKnife® System for Patients with Liver Metastases

Comparative analysis of dose calculation algorithms for CyberKnife-based stereotactic radiotherapy in lung cancer

Comparison of Ray Tracing and Monte Carlo Calculation Algorithms for Spine Lesions Treated With CyberKnife

Quantification of Intrafraction and Interfraction Tumor Motion Amplitude and Prediction Error for Different Liver Tumor Trajectories in Cyberknife Synchrony Tracking

Potential benefit of dose‐escalated stereotactic body radiation therapy using CyberKnife for early‐stage primary lung cancer