Abstract:To use Monte Carlo dose calculation to assess the degree to which tissue inhomogeneities in the head and neck affect static field conformal, computed tomography (CT)-based 6-MV photon treatment plans.We retrospectively studied the three-dimensional treatment plans that had been used for the treatment of 5 patients with tumors in the nasopharyngeal or paranasal sinus regions. Two patients had large surgical cavities. The plans were designed with a clinical treatment planning system that uses a measurement-based pencil-beam dose-calculation algorithm with an equivalent path-length inhomogeneity correction. Each plan employs conformally-shaped 6-MV photon beams. Patient anatomy and electron densities were obtained from the treatment planning CT images. For each plan, the dose distribution was recalculated with the Monte Carlo method, utilizing the same beam geometry and CT images. The Monte Carlo method accurately accounts for the perturbation effects of local tissue heterogeneities. The Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions were compared with those from the clinical treatment planning system.The degree to which tissue inhomogeneity affects the dose distributions of individual fields varies with the specific anatomic geometry, especially the size and location of air cavities in relation to the beam orientation and field size. Most of the beam apertures completely enclose the air cavities within or adjacent to the gross tumor volume (GTV). Equivalent squares (including blocking) ranged from approximately 5 to 9.5 cm. A common feature observed for individual fields is that the Monte Carlo calculated doses to tissue directly behind and within an air cavity are lower. However, after combining the fields employed in each treatment plan, the overall dose distribution shows only small differences between the two methods. For all 5 patients, the Monte Carlo calculated treatment plans showed a slightly lower dose received by the 95% of target volume (D(95)) than the plans calculated with the pencil-beam algorithm. The average difference in the target volume encompassed by the prescription isodose line was less than 2.2%. The difference between the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the GTV was generally small. For the brainstem and chiasm, the DVHs of the two plans were similar. For the spinal cord, differences in the details of the DHV and the dose to 1 cc (D(1cc)) of the structure were observed, with Monte Carlo calculation generally predicting increased dose indices to the spinal cord. However, these changes are not expected to be clinically significant.For 6-MV photons, the effects of both normal tissue inhomogeneities and surgical air cavities on the target coverage were adequately accounted for by conventional pencil beam methods for all of the cases studied. Although differences in details of the DVHs of the normal structures were observed, depending on whether Monte Carlo or pencil-beam algorithm was used for calculation, these differences are not expected to be clinically significant. In general, the pencil-beam calculation corrected for primary attenuation by the equivalent pathlength is a sufficiently accurate method for head-and-neck treatment planning using 6-MV photons.

Comparison of Ray Tracing and Monte Carlo Calculation Algorithms for Spine Lesions Treated With CyberKnife

Comparative analysis of dose calculation algorithms for CyberKnife-based stereotactic radiotherapy in lung cancer

Film‐based Dose Validation of Monte Carlo Algorithm for Cyberknife System with a CIRS Thorax Phantom

A Pencil Beam Dose Calculation Model for Cyberknife System

Dosimetric quality and delivery efficiency of robotic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Comparison with C-arm linear accelerator based plans.

Direct plan comparison of RapidArc and CyberKnife for spine stereotactic body radiation therapy

Clinical Evaluation Of Rtog 0813 Dosimetric Criteria For Lung Sabr Using Iplan Monte Carlo Algorithm

Dosimetric Evaluations of Different Accelerator Based Treatment Modalities for Curative Intent Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Isolated Thoracic Spinal Metastases

A modified formula for dose calculations of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Dosimetric evaluation of 4 different treatment modalities for curative-intent stereotactic body radiation therapy for isolated thoracic spinal metastases.

Dose differences in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans calculated with pencil beam and Monte Carlo for lung SBRT

Benchmarking Techniques for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Glottic Laryngeal Cancer: LINAC-based Non-Coplanar VMAT Vs. Cyberknife Planning

Influence of Using a Contrast-Enhanced CT Image as the Primary Image on CyberKnife Brain Radiosurgery Treatment Plans

Comparative analysis of plan quality and delivery efficiency: ZAP-X vs. CyberKnife for brain metastases treatment

Monte Carlo Evaluation of Tissue Inhomogeneity Effects in the Treatment of the Head and Neck

Dosimetric Comparison of Different Algorithms in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Plan for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Influence of Different Image-Guided Tracking Methods Upon the Local Efficacy of Cyberknife Treatment in Lung Tumors

Cyberknife Radiotherapy on Dose Distribution of Targets: Effect of Different Treatment Paths on Medical Image Diagnostics.

Multiple Brain Metastases Radiosurgery with CyberKnife Device: Dosimetric Comparison between Fixed/Iris and Multileaf Collimator Plans

Dosimetric Comparisons of Different Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy Techniques in Treating Intracranial Tumors > 3 Cm in Longest Diameter

Dosimetric evaluation in Helical TomoTherapy for lung SBRT using Monte Carlo‐based independent dose verification software