Two-phase flow evolution and interfacial area transport downstream of the non-mixing vane spacer grid in rod bundle channels
Xu Yan,Yao Xiao,Xiaowen Wang,Junlong Li,Hanyang Gu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2024.108187
IF: 6.782
2024-10-26
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
Abstract:Two-phase flows are common phenomena in numerous industrial equipment. The complex and changeable phase interface determines the characteristics such as flow pattern evolution and energy-mass transport between the two phases. As a key component of rod bundle fuel assembly in nuclear reactors, the spacer grid plays important roles, including fixing the rod position, promoting mixing, and intensifying heat transfer. This study investigated the axial two-phase flow evolution and interfacial area transport characteristics downstream of the non-mixing vane spacer grid (N-MVSG) inside a tight lattice rod bundle fuel assembly under air-water two-phase flows. A self-developed double-layer wire-mesh sensor (WMS) was adopted to survey 6 positions downstream of the N-MVSG ( Z / D h = 9.15, 14.94, 20.73, 26.52, 32.31, and 61.26), and 42 cases were acquired from bubbly to cap-bubbly and to slug flow. Eventually, void fraction, bubble velocity, interfacial area concentration (IAC), and bubble size distribution (BSD) databases were established. Under the group-1 (G-1) flow, some small bubbles migrate toward the subchannel center, and the void fraction gap-region peak distribution gets weakened. The 1-D void fraction and IAC after the N-MVSG increase first and then gradually recover to its upstream level. Under the two-group flow, the N-MVSG clearly cut group-2 (G-2) bubbles, and the time-averaged void fraction profile downstream of N-MVSG undergoes the evolution of the square distribution, and ring distribution, and then reverts to the upstream core peak distribution. The analysis of BSD results indicates that the G-2 bubbles' break-up is mainly caused by the increment of the flow-field turbulence, rather than the cutting of the N-MVSG. The 1-D void fraction and IAC transport show the total void fraction and IAC increase first and then recover downstream of the N-MVSG. Meanwhile, the G-2 void fraction and IAC reach the maximum before the G-1's due to the coalescence of the G-1 and G-2 bubbles at the N-MVSG's exit. The model evaluation using the IATE without bubble interaction source/sink terms shows that, for most cases, the advection effect and pressure effect dominate the void fraction and IAC evolution. The remarkable bubbles' break-up occurs under the transition cases and the two-group cases with high liquid velocity. In future studies, the additional source/sink term models considering the N-MVSG effect should be developed based on these cases to improve the IATE prediction performance.
thermodynamics,mechanics