Contending with misinformation: Misinformation modality and misinformation type impact misinformation acceptance.

Kara N. Moore,Chenxin Yu,Dara U. Zwemer,Erin M. Carter,Blake L. Nesmith
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000178
2024-06-15
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Abstract:Eyewitness memory can be contaminated by misinformation from many source modalities. The modality of a source can affect how much a person is prompted to contend with whether the misinformation occurred. Misinformation contention could affect the depth at which the misinformation is processed and retrieval monitoring processes, both of which could impact misinformation acceptance. In three experiments, we studied the impact of misinformation contention on misinformation acceptance by manipulating misinformation modality and type. Postevent questions that asked directly if the misinformation occurred led to less misinformation acceptance on the final test than modalities that prompted less misinformation contention. Further, misinformation effects did not emerge for participants who were asked directly if the misinformation occurred regardless of whether they completed a self-administered interview or were interviewed by a person. Additive misinformation resulted in more misinformation acceptance than contradictory misinformation, possibly because contradictory misinformation results in more retrieval monitoring than additive misinformation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)
psychology, experimental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?