Debunking Three Myths About Misinformation

Bertram Gawronski,Lea S. Nahon,Nyx L. Ng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214241280907
IF: 7.867
2024-11-24
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Abstract:Current Directions in Psychological Science, Ahead of Print. Recent years have seen a surge in research on why people fall for misinformation and what can be done about it. Drawing on a framework that conceptualizes truth judgments of true and false information as a signal-detection problem, the current article identifies three inaccurate assumptions in the public and scientific discourse about misinformation: (1) People are bad at discerning true from false information, (2) partisan bias is not a driving force in judgments of misinformation, and (3) gullibility to false information is the main factor underlying inaccurate beliefs. Counter to these assumptions, we argue that (1) people are quite good at discerning true from false information, (2) partisan bias in responses to true and false information is pervasive and strong, and (3) skepticism against belief-incongruent true information is much more pronounced than gullibility to belief-congruent false information. These conclusions have significant implications for person-centered misinformation interventions to tackle inaccurate beliefs.
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?