Abstract:Introduction: The memory conformity effect occurs when people witness a given incident and then talk to each other about it, and the statement of one person affects the memory account of another person with respect to that incident. The main objectives of this experiment were (1) to examine the effectiveness of a modified version of the MORI-v technique in inducing the memory conformity effect and (2) to investigate how the manner in which participants discuss the observed event influences the magnitude of this effect. In general, the modified online MORI-v technique consists of the following main elements: (1) original material , that is, two versions of a short film which are identical except for certain critical details; for example, in one version, a thief puts on a red cap, but in the other version it is black; (2) the collaborative recognition test , that is, a discussion about the original material which leads to mutual misinformation; and (3) an individual recognition test that checks the effect of the discussion on the memory account of the original material. Methods: A total of 72 participants (36 pairs) aged 18–54 took part in the research. Participants were tested using the online MORI-v technique: They were familiarized with the original material on their computers at home, and then they talked about it via a video communication app and completed an individual recognition test on their computers. Importantly, the discussions were recorded and analyzed in detail after the experimental session. Results and discussion: Using the online MORI-v technique, the effect of memory conformity was demonstrated, that is, in the individual recognition test, the proportion of correct answers to questions about discussed details (related to misinformation) was lower than the proportion of correct answers to questions about non-discussed details. It was also demonstrated that if one participant introduced misinformation during the discussion about a particular item and the other did not question it, the latter's answer to that item during the individual recognition test was most often incorrect. However, if one participant introduced misinformation during the discussion about an item and the other questioned it, the latter's answer about that item during the individual recognition test was most often correct.

Is your memory better than mine? Investigating the mechanisms and determinants of the memory conformity effect using a modified MORI technique

Protecting against misinformation: Evaluating the effectiveness of three techniques to reduce memory conformity

Online misinformation can distort witnesses' memories. Analysis of co-witness discussions using an online version of the MORI-v technique

Will your words become mine? Underlying processes and cowitness intimacy in the memory conformity paradigm.

An individual differences approach to the suggestibility of memory over time

Misinformation in social interaction: examining the role of discussion

Laypeople's beliefs about the effects of common estimator variables on memory

Individual Differences in False Memory from Misinformation: Cognitive Factors

The medium and the message: Comparing the effectiveness of six methods of misinformation delivery in an eyewitness memory paradigm.

A Cross‐Cultural and Intra‐Cultural Investigation of the Misinformation Effect in Eyewitness Memory Reports

The influence of confabulations about the reasons for the choice on the formation of false memories

Treat and Trick: A New Way to Increase False Memory

The power of emotion versus the power of suggestion: Memory for emotional events in the misinformation paradigm.

Long-lasting positive effects of collaborative remembering on false assents to misleading questions

Individual Differences in False Memory from Misinformation: Personality Characteristics and Their Interactions with Cognitive Abilities

Intrinsic functional connectivity in medial temporal lobe networks is associated with susceptibility to misinformation

A Study on False Memory Induced by Misleading Information

Warning before misinformation exposure modulates memory encoding

Reality monitoring and metacognitive judgments in a false-memory paradigm

Double misinformation and eyewitness performance: An experimental replication

Disrupters As Well As Monitors: Roles of Others During and after Collaborative Remembering in the DRM Procedure