Abstract:Misinformation often continues to influence people's beliefs and reasoning even after retracted-this persistence is termed the 'continued influence effect of misinformation' (CIEM). Both of the mental-model-updating hypothesis and the memory-retrieval-failure hypothesis attempt to explain this phenomenon. The neural substrates of CIEM are controversial, and results from different studies support different assumptions. The disputations may relate to neglection of potential contribution of inhibitory control in CIEM and of methodological differences between studies. This study aimed to investigate neural substrates and cognitive mechanism of CIEM using the functional magnetic resonance imaging (MIRO from the view of inhibition control. Thirty-one participants (10 males) were recruited in this study. They were instructed to read brief, fictional news reports and answer three inference questions after reading while lying in a 3.0T Siemens Prisma MRI scanner. Each participant needed to read 40 reports (20 reports in their retraction versions and 20 in their control versions). Each fictional report contained six sentences and derived retraction and control versions based on whether the second sentence contained misinformation. Pseudorandom uniform temporal jitter was used for this fMRI design. Imaging data were preprocessed and processed using SPM, RESTplus and DPABI toolbox to obtain the functional activities of the ROIs and their functional connectivity. Multi-comparison tests were conducted for brain activities induced by target sentence 5 (encoding phase) and three reasoning sentences (retrieval phase) under different versions. The results showed: (1) retractions elicited less activity in the left middle temporal gyros (BA21/22) than control during encoding phase; and retractions also elicited less activity in the left middle frontal gyrus (L_MFG, BA10) and right anterior cingulate cortex (R_ACC, BA32) than control during retrieval phase. Additionally, activation at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L_DLPFC, BA9) in the retraction condition was marginally significantly different from that in the control condition during retrieval phase. No significant activation difference was observed across conditions in others ROI. (2) A marginally significantly negative correlation was found between functional metrics (Beta) of the left MFG in retraction condition and individuals' interference scores. (3) With regard to functional connectivity, we compared the connectivity between two seeds (left MFG and right ACC) and the rest of the brain in control versus retraction condition during retrieval phase. Results demonstrated that the right ACC showed decreased functional connectivity with the bilateral inferior occipital gyrus (10G) under retraction condition when compared to control condition. The left MFG showed similar decreased connectivity with the bilateral IOG under retraction condition when compared to control, but increased functional connectivity with right precentral gyms under retraction condition when compared to control. The results suggest that the CIEM be related to semantic encoding failure during information comprehension and inhibition failure of misinformation during information retrieval. The mental-model-updating hypothesis and the memory-retrieval-failure hypothesis can explain the different phase of CIEM. The findings provide more experimental evidence for neural basis of CIEM and refine corresponding theoretical accounts, and provide neurological clues for further exploration of ways to reduce the negative impact of CIEM in the future.

Intrinsic functional connectivity in medial temporal lobe networks is associated with susceptibility to misinformation

Individual Differences in False Memory from Misinformation: Cognitive Factors

Cross-stage Neural Pattern Similarity in the Hippocampus Predicts False Memory Derived from Post-Event Inaccurate Information

Do cognitive abilities reduce eyewitness susceptibility to the misinformation effect? A systematic review

An individual differences approach to the suggestibility of memory over time

Individual Differences in False Memory from Misinformation: Personality Characteristics and Their Interactions with Cognitive Abilities

Who is susceptible in three false memory tasks?

Intrinsic Connectivity Between the Hippocampus and Posteromedial Cortex Predicts Memory Performance in Cognitively Intact Older Individuals

The Neural Basis of the Continued Influence Effect of Misinformation

Distress reactions and susceptibility to misinformation for an analogue trauma event

Creating emotional false recollections: Perceptual recombination and conceptual fluency mechanisms.

The mnemonic effect of central and peripheral misinformation on social media

Concerns about confounds: False memory as an explanation for a hippocampus-supported implicit eye-movement-based relational memory effect

Warning before misinformation exposure modulates memory encoding

False memories in music listening: exploring the misinformation effect and individual difference factors in auditory memory

Unethical amnesia brain: Memory and metacognitive distortion induced by dishonesty

Lying on misleading information: false confirmation leads to memory errors

Persistence of false memories and emergence of collective false memory: collaborative recall of DRM word lists

Brief Exposure to Misinformation Can Lead to Long-Term False Memories

The Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms Underlying False Memory: an Information Processing Perspective

Neural mechanisms of the continued influence effect of misinformation: Analysis based on fMRI causal connectivity