Abstract:The DRM (Deese–Roediger–McDermott) paradigm produces robust false memories of non-presented critical words. After studying a thematic word list (e.g., bed, rest , and pillow ) participants falsely remember the critical item “sleep.” We report two false memory experiments. Study One introduces a novel use of the lexical decision task (LDT) to prime critical words. Participants see two letter-strings and make timed responses indicating whether they are both words. The word pairs Night-Bed and Dream-Thweeb both prime “sleep” but only one pair contains two words. Our primary purpose is to introduce this new methodology via two pilot experiments. The results, considered preliminary, are promising as they indicate that participants were as likely to recognize critical words (false memories) and presented words (true memories) just as when studying thematic lists. Study Two actually employs the standard DRM lists so that semantic priming is in play there as well. The second study, however, uses functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure activity in the prefrontal cortex during a DRM task which includes a deception phase where participants intentionally lie about critical lures. False and true memories occurred at high levels and activated many of the same brain regions but, compared to true memories, cortical activity was higher for false memories and lies. Accuracy findings are accompanied by confidence and reaction time results. Both investigations suggest that it is difficult to distinguish accurate from inaccurate memories. We explain results in terms of activation-monitoring theory and Fuzzy Trace Theory. We provide real world implications and suggest extending the present research to varying age groups and special populations. A nagging question has not been satisfactorily answered: Could neural pathways exist that signal the presence of false memories and lies? Answering this question will require imaging experiments that focus on regions of distinction such as the anterior prefrontal cortex.

Concerns about confounds: False memory as an explanation for a hippocampus-supported implicit eye-movement-based relational memory effect

Is implicit memory associated with the hippocampus?

The dead salmon strikes again: Reports of unconscious processing in the hippocampus may reflect Type-I error

The hippocampus and implicit memory

When perception fades, the hippocampus may support implicit memory

Intrinsic functional connectivity in medial temporal lobe networks is associated with susceptibility to misinformation

The Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms Underlying False Memory: an Information Processing Perspective

Cross-stage Neural Pattern Similarity in the Hippocampus Predicts False Memory Derived from Post-Event Inaccurate Information

Intrinsic Connectivity Between the Hippocampus and Posteromedial Cortex Predicts Memory Performance in Cognitively Intact Older Individuals

Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception

Anterior Hippocampal Engagement during Memory Formation Predicts Subsequent False Recognition of Similar Experiences

Emotional false memories: the impact of response bias under speeded retrieval conditions

Cross-cultural comparison of the neural correlates of true and false memory retrieval

The Executive Control of Face Memory

Multiple Interactive Memory Representations Underlie the Induction of False Memory

A self-reference false memory effect in the DRM paradigm: Evidence from Eastern and Western samples

Neuroanatomical Correlates of Implicit and Explicit Memory for Structurally Possible and Impossible Visual Objects.

A study of EEG non-stationarity on inducing false memory in different emotional states

Emotion and false memory: How goal-irrelevance can be relevant for what people remember

Dismissing the role of the hippocampus in implicit memory is special pleading

Dynamic Changes in Neural Representations Underlie the Repetition Effect on False Memory