Abstract:Consolidating memories for long-term storage depends on reactivation. Reactivation occurs both consciously, during wakefulness, and unconsciously, during wakefulness and sleep. While considerable work has examined conscious awake and unconscious sleep reactivation, in this study, we directly compare the consequences of conscious and unconscious reactivation during wakefulness. Forty-one participants learned associations consisting of adjective-object-position triads. Objects were clustered into distinct semantic groups (e.g., fruits, vehicles) such that we could examine consequences of reactivation on semantically related memories. After an intensive learning protocol, we systematically reactivated some of the triads by presenting the adjective as a cue. Reactivation was done so that it was consciously experienced for some triads, and only unconsciously processed for others. Memory for spatial positions, the most distal part of the association, was affected by reactivation in a consciousness-dependent and memory-strength-dependent manner. Conscious reactivation resulted in weakening of semantically related memories that were strong initially, resonating with prior findings of retrieval-induced forgetting. Unconscious reactivation, on the other hand, selectively benefited weak reactivated memories, as previously shown for reactivation during sleep. Semantically linked memories were not impaired, but rather were integrated with the reactivated memory. These results taken together demonstrate that conscious and unconscious reactivation have qualitatively different consequences. Results support a consciousness-dependent inhibition account, whereby unconscious reactivation entails less inhibition than conscious reactivation, thus allowing more liberal spread of activation. Findings set the stage for additional exploration into the role of conscious experience in memory storage and structuring.

Unconscious processing effects manifest only if conscious processing is excluded

Dismissing the role of the hippocampus in implicit memory is special pleading

Is implicit memory associated with the hippocampus?

When perception fades, the hippocampus may support implicit memory

The dead salmon strikes again: Reports of unconscious processing in the hippocampus may reflect Type-I error

Similar Effects for Resting State and Unconscious Thought: Both Solve Multi-attribute Choices Better Than Conscious Thought

Concerns about confounds: False memory as an explanation for a hippocampus-supported implicit eye-movement-based relational memory effect

The hippocampus and implicit memory

Unconscious automatic brain activation of acoustic and action-related conceptual features during masked repetition priming

Reconsidering Unconscious Persistence: Suppressing Unwanted Memories Reduces Their Indirect Expression in Later Thoughts

Unconscious Processing Contaminates Objective Measures of Conscious Perception: Evidence From the Liminal Prime Paradigm

The hippocampus and implicit memory (by any other name)

The hippocampus as a "stupid," domain-specific module: Implications for theories of recent and remote memory, and of imagination.

The unconscious processing information

Extending a focused attention paradigm to critically test for unconscious congruency effects

Consciousness' Movement of Implicit Memory Insequence Learning

No evidence for unconscious initiation and following of arithmetic rules: A replication study.

The reach of reactivation: Effects of consciously triggered versus unconsciously triggered reactivation of associative memory

A Theory of Working Memory Without Consciousness or Sustained Activity

Unconscious Self-processing: Subconscious, Unintentional or Subliminal?

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences the Porous Boundaries between Explicit and Implicit Memory: Behavioral and Neural Evidence