Abstract:The DRM (Deese–Roediger–McDermott) paradigm produces robust false memories of non-presented critical words. After studying a thematic word list (e.g., bed, rest , and pillow ) participants falsely remember the critical item “sleep.” We report two false memory experiments. Study One introduces a novel use of the lexical decision task (LDT) to prime critical words. Participants see two letter-strings and make timed responses indicating whether they are both words. The word pairs Night-Bed and Dream-Thweeb both prime “sleep” but only one pair contains two words. Our primary purpose is to introduce this new methodology via two pilot experiments. The results, considered preliminary, are promising as they indicate that participants were as likely to recognize critical words (false memories) and presented words (true memories) just as when studying thematic lists. Study Two actually employs the standard DRM lists so that semantic priming is in play there as well. The second study, however, uses functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure activity in the prefrontal cortex during a DRM task which includes a deception phase where participants intentionally lie about critical lures. False and true memories occurred at high levels and activated many of the same brain regions but, compared to true memories, cortical activity was higher for false memories and lies. Accuracy findings are accompanied by confidence and reaction time results. Both investigations suggest that it is difficult to distinguish accurate from inaccurate memories. We explain results in terms of activation-monitoring theory and Fuzzy Trace Theory. We provide real world implications and suggest extending the present research to varying age groups and special populations. A nagging question has not been satisfactorily answered: Could neural pathways exist that signal the presence of false memories and lies? Answering this question will require imaging experiments that focus on regions of distinction such as the anterior prefrontal cortex.

False memories in forensic psychology: do cognition and brain activity tell the same story?

The Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms Underlying False Memory: an Information Processing Perspective

Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception

Effect of False Memory Research on the Verification of Testimonies of Witnesses

Individual Differences in False Memory from Misinformation: Cognitive Factors

About the Research on Suggestibility and False Memory

"I heard it before ... or not": time-course of ERP response and behavioural correlates associated with false recognition memory

Introduction to the special issue: the neuroscience of false memory

Recent Advances in the Research on Children's False Memory:Developmental Reversals in False Memory

A Study on False Memory Induced by Misleading Information

Fool me twice: how effective is debriefing in false memory studies?

Unringing the bell: Successful debriefing following a rich false memory study

Cross-stage Neural Pattern Similarity in the Hippocampus Predicts False Memory Derived from Post-Event Inaccurate Information

Judges and lawyers' beliefs in repression and dissociative amnesia may imperil justice: further guidance required

False memory in a second language: The importance of controlling the knowledge of word meaning

Multiple Interactive Memory Representations Underlie the Induction of False Memory

Children's false memory and true disclosure in the face of repeated questions

Who is susceptible in three false memory tasks?

Motivated False Memory

A court ruled case on therapy-induced false memories

Knowledge of legal professionals about age trends in false memory propensity: a vignette study