Abstract:Introduction: The memory conformity effect occurs when people witness a given incident and then talk to each other about it, and the statement of one person affects the memory account of another person with respect to that incident. The main objectives of this experiment were (1) to examine the effectiveness of a modified version of the MORI-v technique in inducing the memory conformity effect and (2) to investigate how the manner in which participants discuss the observed event influences the magnitude of this effect. In general, the modified online MORI-v technique consists of the following main elements: (1) original material , that is, two versions of a short film which are identical except for certain critical details; for example, in one version, a thief puts on a red cap, but in the other version it is black; (2) the collaborative recognition test , that is, a discussion about the original material which leads to mutual misinformation; and (3) an individual recognition test that checks the effect of the discussion on the memory account of the original material. Methods: A total of 72 participants (36 pairs) aged 18–54 took part in the research. Participants were tested using the online MORI-v technique: They were familiarized with the original material on their computers at home, and then they talked about it via a video communication app and completed an individual recognition test on their computers. Importantly, the discussions were recorded and analyzed in detail after the experimental session. Results and discussion: Using the online MORI-v technique, the effect of memory conformity was demonstrated, that is, in the individual recognition test, the proportion of correct answers to questions about discussed details (related to misinformation) was lower than the proportion of correct answers to questions about non-discussed details. It was also demonstrated that if one participant introduced misinformation during the discussion about a particular item and the other did not question it, the latter's answer to that item during the individual recognition test was most often incorrect. However, if one participant introduced misinformation during the discussion about an item and the other questioned it, the latter's answer about that item during the individual recognition test was most often correct.

The impact of misinformation presented during jury deliberation on juror memory and decision-making

The Impact of Rape Myth Education on Jury Decision-Making: A Systematic Review

Changes in Certitude, Adherence, and Attitude: Immediate Effects of Rape Myth Intervention on Jurors in a Mock Trial.

Warning before misinformation exposure modulates memory encoding

Is justice blind or myopic? An examination of the effects of meta-cognitive myopia and truth bias on mock jurors and judges

Online misinformation can distort witnesses' memories. Analysis of co-witness discussions using an online version of the MORI-v technique

Witnesses' susceptibility to misleading post-event information delivered in a social media-style video

Distress reactions and susceptibility to misinformation for an analogue trauma event

Protecting against misinformation: Evaluating the effectiveness of three techniques to reduce memory conformity

The Role of Complainant/Defendant Gender and Form of Sexual Assault on Jurors' Perceptions of Prototypicality and Verdicts

The medium and the message: Comparing the effectiveness of six methods of misinformation delivery in an eyewitness memory paradigm.

Juror Perceptions of Bystander and Victim Intoxication by Different Substances

Mental health in the courtroom: how victim mental health status impacts juror decision-making in a rape case

Tipsy Testimonies: The Effect of Alcohol Intoxication Status, Crime Role and Juror Characteristics on Mock Jury Decision‐Making

Contending with misinformation: Misinformation modality and misinformation type impact misinformation acceptance.

Misinformation in social interaction: examining the role of discussion

An experimental examination of the effects of alcohol consumption and exposure to misleading postevent information on remembering a hypothetical rape scenario

Lying on misleading information: false confirmation leads to memory errors

Judges and lawyers' beliefs in repression and dissociative amnesia may imperil justice: further guidance required

The persuasive effects of social cues and source effects on misinformation susceptibility

The Impact of Defendant Gender and Attractiveness on Juror Decision-Making in a Sexual Offense Case