Reply to the Comment on the Article "On the Time Integral of Electromagnetic Field" (J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 136, 406 (2023))

R. M. Feshchenko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/s1063776123120063

2024-01-28

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics

Abstract:Reply to the comment on the article "On the time integral of electromagnetic field," J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 136 , 406 (2023)).

physics, multidisciplinary

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Comment to the Article "On the Time Integral of Electromagnetic Field" by R.M. Feshchenko (J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 136, 406 (2023))

M. V. Arkhipov,R. M. Arkhipov,N. N. Rosanov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/s1063776123120026

2024-01-28

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics

Abstract:The article by R. M. Feshchenko (J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 136 , 406 (2023)) is devoted to an important issue concerning general properties of electromagnetic field pulses and contains, in particular, critical remarks on our publications (R. M. Arkhipov et al. Quant. Electronics 50 , 801 (2020); R. Arkhipov et al., Laser Field Lett. 19 , 043001 (2022), and M. V. Arkhipov et al., JETP Lett. 115 , 1 (2022)). We reply to these critical remarks and indicate a number of inaccuracies in the aforementioned article.

physics, multidisciplinary
Comment on the Comment on Deformation of Quantum-Mechanics

YQ LI,ZM SHENG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/24/3/384

1995-01-01

Communications in Theoretical Physics

Abstract:This is a reply to the comment by Chung and Chung [J. Phys. A27 (1994) 5037]. We point out that the discussion there is imperfect.
Qin Et Al. Reply

Nan Qin,Emmanuelle Le Chatelier,Jing Guo,Edi Prifti,Lanjuan Li,S. Dusko Ehrlich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14852

IF: 64.8

2015-01-01

Nature

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by J. H. Chen and H. Y. Fan.Received 22 May 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.269502© 2013 American Physical Society
Reply to "Comment on 'Theoretical analysis of the force on the end face of a nano-filament exerted by an outgoing light pulse'"

Masud Mansuripur,Armis R. Zakharian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.057802

2014-05-23

Abstract:We respond to a Comment on our paper [Physical Review A 80, 023823 (2009)], which appears to have stemmed from a misunderstanding of the various energy-momentum tensors of classical electrodynamics. It is shown that each stress tensor, when used in conjunction with the corresponding force-density and momentum-density expressions, yields results that are consistent with Maxwell's equations and with the conservation laws.

Optics,Classical Physics
Reply to "Comment on `Extending the laws of thermodynamics for arbitrary autonomous quantum systems'"

Cyril Elouard,Camille Lombard Latune

2023-09-15

Abstract:In his Comment [1], Philip Strasberg (PS) argues from the analysis of different examples that the framework we have presented in [2] does not recover known results of macroscopic textbook thermodynamics. Here, we show that such apparent contradictions disappear when the necessary assumptions the aforementioned known results pre-suppose are applied. Those assumptions concern the control ability of the observer, the nature of the described degree of freedom, or the scale of the systems. The ability to relax those assumptions is precisely a motivation of our framework, which can explore the capacity of quantum systems to exchange work and heat even at scales not captured by textbook thermodynamics. We take the opportunity of this reply to further expand on the use of our framework and its connections with traditional thermodynamics.

Quantum Physics
Comment on "electrostatic and Magnetic Transport of Energetic Ions in Turbulent Plasmas".

Wenlu Zhang,Lin Zhang,Liu Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.107.239501

IF: 8.6

2011-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Comment on the Letter by T. Hauff et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 075004 (2009). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 8 October 2010DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.239501© 2011 American Physical Society
Comments on "On the formulation of hybrid finite-element and boundary-integral methods for 3-D scattering" [with reply]

T. E. Eibert,volkert hansen,X. Q. Sheng,J. M. Jin,jiming song,C. C. Lu,W. C. Chew

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/8.827397

IF: 5.7

2000-01-01

IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

Abstract:For original article by X. Q. Sheng et al. see ibid., vol.46, no.3, p.303-11 (Mar. 1998).
Reply to the Comment by Yubo Wang Et Al.

Xueren Hong,Huiqi LI,Ke Shi,Dou Wei,Yanan LI,Rongan Tang,Jianan Sun,Wenshan Duan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/acb287

2023-01-01

Abstract:In the Reply, we suppose that although the higher order correction terms of the combined field with a tightly focused Gaussian laser pulse and an external uniform magnetic field have certain influence on the dynamics and radiation spectrum of the electron, it does not affect the issues and concerns studied in our paper [EPL, 139 (2022) 14001]. Therefore, it is feasible for us to adopt the lowest order approximation for the tightly focused Gaussian laser pulse and it does not affect the main ideas and conclusions of our paper.
Reply to "Comment on 'Ultracold plasma expansion in quadrupole magnetic field' "

S. Ya. Bronin,E. V. Vikhrov,B. B. Zelener,B. V. Zelener

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.110.027202

IF: 2.707

2024-08-23

Physical Review E

Abstract:In this Reply, we respond to the Comment by Schlitters et al. on our recent work [ Phys. Rev. E 108 , 045209 (2023)], where we present simulation results of ultracold Sr plasma expansion in a quadrupole magnetic field using a molecular-dynamics method. In the Comment, Schlitters et al. present their experimental results, some of which, from their point of view, contradict our simulation results and others that confirm the experiments of Gorman et al. [ Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 , 085002 (2021)] and our results. In addition, Schlitters et al. also provide results that were not described in our work. Here we show that there is not a contradiction but a misunderstanding of our results. This is due to the fact that simulations allow the use of processing methods that are difficult to obtain in experiment. We also present different simulation results related to expansion velocity variations that reflect the experimental results of Schlitters et al. and provide an explanation for the origin of these variations. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.110.027202 ©2024 American Physical Society

physics, fluids & plasmas, mathematical
Tang, Feng, and Golubovic Reply:

Chao Tang,Shechao Feng,Leonardo Golubovic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.74.3500

IF: 8.6

1995-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by E. H. Brandt.Received 27 January 1995DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3500©1995 American Physical Society
Reply to the comment on "Quantum principle of relativity"

Andrzej Dragan,Artur Ekert

2023-08-31

Abstract:We discuss critical remarks raised by Horodecki towards our work on the connection between superluminal extension of special relativity and fundamental aspects of quantum theory.

Quantum Physics
Gao et al. Reply

Hong-Jun Gao,Karl Sohlberg,Z. Q. Xue,H. Y. Chen,S. M. Hou,L. P. Ma,X. W. Fang,Stephen J. Pennycook

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.87.179707

IF: 8.6

2001-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Yanming Zhao et al.Received 2 June 2001DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.179707©2001 American Physical Society
Reply to 'Comment on "Thermodynamics of quantum crystalline membranes"'

B. Amorim,R. Roldán,E. Cappelluti,F. Guinea,A. Fasolino,M. I. Katsnelson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.176302

2014-10-09

Abstract:In this note, we reply to the comment made by <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://E.I.Kats" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> and <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://V.V.Lebedev" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1407.4298" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.4298">arXiv:1407.4298</a>] on our recent work "Thermodynamics of quantum crystalline membranes" [Phys. Rev. B 89, 224307 (2014)]. Kats and Lebedev question the validity of the calculation presented in our work, in particular on the use of a Debye momentum as a ultra-violet regulator for the theory. We address and counter argue the criticisms made by Kats and Lebedev to our work.

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics,Statistical Mechanics
Reply to "Comment on 'Precision measurement of the Casimir-Lifshitz force in a fluid'"

J. N. Munday,Federico Capasso

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.77.036103

2008-02-27

Abstract:We have reviewed the Comment of Geyer et al. [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0708.1548" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.1548">arXiv:0708.1548</a>] concerning our recent work [Phys. Rev. A 75, 060102 (R) (2007)], and while we disagree with their criticisms, we acknowledge them for giving us the opportunity to add interesting addition material and a more detailed description of our experiment. We describe further our calculation and explain why a more sophisticated model is not warranted. We also present detailed experiments on the effects of electrostatic forces in our measurements and show that the contribution due to work function differences is small and that the residual electrostatic force is dominated by trapped charges and external fields. Finally, we estimate the effect of double layer interactions. These additional calculations and measurements support our original conclusion that the experimental results are consistent with the Lifshitz theory.

Quantum Physics
Response to "Response to 'Comment on Theoretical examination of QED Hamiltonian in relativistic molecular orbital theory'" [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 187102 (2024)]

Wenjian Liu

2024-06-24

Abstract:The Response [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 187102 (2024)] of Inoue and coworkers to my Comment [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 187101 (2024)] on their original paper [J. Chem. Phys. 159, 054105 (2023)] clarifies some points put forward in my Comment, but also raises some new issues that require further clarifications. It is believed that the present Response has settled down everything.

Chemical Physics
Response to “comment on ‘surface Electromagnetic Wave Equations in a Warm Magnetized Quantum Plasma’” [phys. Plasmas 23, 074701 (2016)]

Chunhua Li,Zhengwei Wu,Weihong Yang,Paul K. Chu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4958656

IF: 2.2

2016-01-01

Physics of Plasmas

Abstract:By reviewing the previous work [C. Li et al., Phys. Plasmas 21, 072114 (2014)] and the Comment of Moradi, some errors are found. Also, an erratum is given in this Response.
Luoet Al.reply:

Hong‐Gang Luo,Tao Xiang,X. Q. Wang,Zhixun Su,Lu Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.96.019702

IF: 8.6

2006-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Ch. Kolf et al.Received 30 October 2005DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.019702©2006 American Physical Society
Reply to comment in <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1802.01382" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01382">arXiv:1802.01382</a>

T. P. Xiong,L. L. Yan,F. Zhou,K. Rehan,D. F. Liang,L. Chen,W. L. Yang,Z. H. Ma,M. Feng,V. Vedral

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.02392

2018-08-05

Abstract:Here we respond to a comment [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1802.01382" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01382">arXiv:1802.01382</a>] submitted recently on 'Experimental Verification of a Jarzynski-Related Information-Theoretic Equality by a Single Trapped Ion' PRL 120 010601 (2018). We consider that the argument is the thermalization in a quantum system, which is different from the counterpart in conventional thermodynamics.

Quantum Physics
Zu et al. reply:.

C Zu,Y-X Wang,D-L Deng,X-Y Chang,K Liu,P-Y Hou,H-X Yang,L-M Duan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.110.078902

IF: 8.6

2013-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by E. Amselem et al.Received 4 December 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.078902© 2013 American Physical Society
Reply to Comment on "Multitime Quantum Communication: Interesting But Not Counterfactual" by L. Vaidman

Robert B. Griffiths

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.056202

2024-02-02

Abstract:This is a Reply to the Comment by Vaidman in <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2306.16756" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16756">arXiv:2306.16756</a> on the paper: R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)

Quantum Physics

Reply to the Comment on the Article "On the Time Integral of Electromagnetic Field" (J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 136, 406 (2023))

Comment to the Article "On the Time Integral of Electromagnetic Field" by R.M. Feshchenko (J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 136, 406 (2023))

Comment on the Comment on Deformation of Quantum-Mechanics

Qin Et Al. Reply

Reply to "Comment on 'Theoretical analysis of the force on the end face of a nano-filament exerted by an outgoing light pulse'"

Reply to "Comment on `Extending the laws of thermodynamics for arbitrary autonomous quantum systems'"

Comment on "electrostatic and Magnetic Transport of Energetic Ions in Turbulent Plasmas".

Comments on "On the formulation of hybrid finite-element and boundary-integral methods for 3-D scattering" [with reply]

Reply to the Comment by Yubo Wang Et Al.

Reply to "Comment on 'Ultracold plasma expansion in quadrupole magnetic field' "

Tang, Feng, and Golubovic Reply:

Reply to the comment on "Quantum principle of relativity"

Gao et al. Reply

Reply to 'Comment on "Thermodynamics of quantum crystalline membranes"'

Reply to "Comment on 'Precision measurement of the Casimir-Lifshitz force in a fluid'"

Response to "Response to 'Comment on Theoretical examination of QED Hamiltonian in relativistic molecular orbital theory'" [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 187102 (2024)]

Response to “comment on ‘surface Electromagnetic Wave Equations in a Warm Magnetized Quantum Plasma’” [phys. Plasmas 23, 074701 (2016)]

Luoet Al.reply:

Reply to comment in <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1802.01382" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01382">arXiv:1802.01382</a>

Zu et al. reply:.

Reply to Comment on "Multitime Quantum Communication: Interesting But Not Counterfactual" by L. Vaidman