Comment on “magnus and Iordanskii Forces in Superfluids”

C Wexler,DJ Thouless,P Ao,Q Niu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.80.4356

IF: 8.6

1998-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Comment on the Letter by H. E. Hall and J. R. Hook, Phys. Rev. Lett 79, 1321 (1997). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 18 August 1997DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4356©1998 American Physical Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Comment on "Magnus force and acoustic Stewart-Tolman effect in type-II superconductors, by Fil et al

P. Ao

2007-01-01

Abstract:Fil {\it et al.} has proposed an interesting experimental method to investigate vortex dynamics. Some preliminary results have been obtained. In this comment I discuss a few missing but strongly related theoretical models and experiments on Hall anomaly and Magnus force. I conclude that those missing literature can enhance the value of novel experimental method proposed in the commented 2006 Europhysics Letters by Fil {\it et al.}.
Reply to Comment on "Quantum Force in a Superconductor"

A.V.Nikulov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0304313

2003-04-14

Abstract:A reply is made to Comment by <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://D.P.Sheehan" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> in which he takes notice that the quantum force introduced in my earlier paper <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://A.V.Nikulov" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>, Phys. Rev. B 64, 012505 (2001) challenges to the absolute status of the second law of thermodynamics. It is shown that the introduction of the quantum force explains only an experimental challenge to the second law. The observation of the persistent current at non-zero resistance R > 0 is experimental evidence of violation of the postulate saving the second law in the beginning of the 20 century. According to this postulate any Brownian motion is absolutely random whereas the persistent current at R > 0 is a regulated Brownian motion.

Superconductivity,Statistical Mechanics
Wexleret Al.reply:

Carlos Wexler,D. J. Thouless,Ping Ao,Qian Niu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.81.4277

IF: 8.6

1998-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by E. B. Sonin.Received 9 September 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4277©1998 American Physical Society
Comment on “melting Line of Hydrogen at High Pressures”

Alexander Goncharov,Russell J Hemley,E Gregoryanz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.102.149601

IF: 8.6

2009-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Comment on the Letter by Shanti Deemyad and Isaac F. Silvera, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 155701 (2008). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 12 May 2008DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.149601©2009 American Physical Society
Qin Et Al. Reply

Nan Qin,Emmanuelle Le Chatelier,Jing Guo,Edi Prifti,Lanjuan Li,S. Dusko Ehrlich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14852

IF: 64.8

2015-01-01

Nature

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by J. H. Chen and H. Y. Fan.Received 22 May 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.269502© 2013 American Physical Society
Comment On "Ferroelectric Order Of Parallel Bistable Hydrogen Bonds"

Hong-Ling Cai,Da-Wei Fu,Yi Zhang,Wen Zhang,Ren-Gen Xiong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.169601

IF: 8.6

2012-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Comment on the Letter by M. Szafrański, A. Katrusiak, and G.J. McIntyre, M. Szafrański, A. Katrusiak, and G.J. McIntyre, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 215507 (2002)PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.89.215507. The authors of the Letter offer a Reply. © 2012 American Physical Society.
Comment on "electrostatic and Magnetic Transport of Energetic Ions in Turbulent Plasmas".

Wenlu Zhang,Lin Zhang,Liu Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.107.239501

IF: 8.6

2011-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Comment on the Letter by T. Hauff et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 075004 (2009). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 8 October 2010DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.239501© 2011 American Physical Society
Reply to the Comment of den Hartog and van Wees on "Conductance Fluctuations in Mesoscopic Normal-Metal/Superconductor Samples"

Klaus Hecker,Helmut Hegger,Alexander Altland,Klaus Fiegle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5024

1998-06-25

Abstract:In their comment <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="cond-mat/9710285" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9710285">cond-mat/9710285</a> [Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5024 (1998)] den Hartog and van Wees (HW) raise objections against our analysis of the experimental data presented in <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="cond-mat/9708162" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9708162">cond-mat/9708162</a> [Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1547 (1997)]. According to HW, we did not account for the quantum phase incoherence introduced by the Niobium compounds of the investigated Nb/Au hybrid samples. Here we show that and why this criticism is not justified. Some difficulties associated with a precise determination of the coherence lengths are discussed. It is discussed why these uncertainties do not have a qualitative impact on the results reported in our paper.

Superconductivity,Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics
Reply to "Comment on 'Precision measurement of the Casimir-Lifshitz force in a fluid'"

J. N. Munday,Federico Capasso

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.77.036103

2008-02-27

Abstract:We have reviewed the Comment of Geyer et al. [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0708.1548" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.1548">arXiv:0708.1548</a>] concerning our recent work [Phys. Rev. A 75, 060102 (R) (2007)], and while we disagree with their criticisms, we acknowledge them for giving us the opportunity to add interesting addition material and a more detailed description of our experiment. We describe further our calculation and explain why a more sophisticated model is not warranted. We also present detailed experiments on the effects of electrostatic forces in our measurements and show that the contribution due to work function differences is small and that the residual electrostatic force is dominated by trapped charges and external fields. Finally, we estimate the effect of double layer interactions. These additional calculations and measurements support our original conclusion that the experimental results are consistent with the Lifshitz theory.

Quantum Physics
Comment on “High-Pressure Melting Curve of Nitrogen and the Liquid-Liquid Phase Transition”

Eugene Gregoryanz,Alexander F. Goncharov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.102.049601

IF: 8.6

2009-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Comment on the Letter by Goutam Dev Mukherjee and Reinhard Boehler, [Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 225701 (2007)]. The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 4 February 2008DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.049601©2009 American Physical Society
Gao et al. Reply

Hong-Jun Gao,Karl Sohlberg,Z. Q. Xue,H. Y. Chen,S. M. Hou,L. P. Ma,X. W. Fang,Stephen J. Pennycook

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.87.179707

IF: 8.6

2001-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Yanming Zhao et al.Received 2 June 2001DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.179707©2001 American Physical Society
Is There Coexistence of Itinerant Ferromagnetism Ands-Wave Superconductivity?

R. Shen,Z. M. Zheng,D. Y. Xing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.91.069702

IF: 8.6

2003-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Comment on the Letter by .Received 28 January 2002DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.069702©2003 American Physical Society
Comment On "High-Pressure Melting Curve Of Nitrogen And The Liquid-Liquid Phase Transition"

E. Gregoryanz,Alexander F Goncharov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.049601

IF: 8.6

2009-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Comment on the Letter by Goutam Dev Mukherjee and Reinhard Boehler, [Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 225701 (2007)]. The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
Comment on "Transverse Force on a Quantized Vortex in a Superfluid"

G.E. Volovik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.4687

1996-06-28

Abstract:The result of Thouless, Ao and Niu (TAN), that the mutual friction parameter $d_\perp =0$, contradicts to the experiments made in rotating 3He-B by Manchester group. The Manchester group observed that $d_\perp <0$ at low temperature and approaches 1 at high temperature. The reason of the contradiction is that TAN did not take into account the Iordanskii force on the vortex and the spectral flow force, which comes from the anomaly related to the low-energy bound states of fermions in cores of quantized vortices. The Iordanskii force is responsible for the negative $d_\perp <0$ at low temperature, while due to the spectral flow $d_\perp$ approaches 1 at high temperature. Relation of the spectral flow anomaly with the paradoxes of the linear and angular momenta in gapless superfluids is discussed.

Condensed Matter
Comment on "Superfluidity in the interior-gap states"

W. Vincent Liu,Frank Wilczek

2003-01-01

Abstract:In a recent paper [cond-mat/0303185], Wu and Yip presented calculations that they interpreted as indicating an instability of the interior gap phase -- a new, hybrid superfluid-normal state of matter that we proposed in [PRL 90, 047002 (2003)]. Here we observe that their interpretation does not apply to the situations of most physical interest. Their instability was derived under the implicit assumption that one should perturb the relevant systems, which typically contain two distinct species, at fixed values of the separate chemical potentials. However it can be, and generally is, appropriate to enforce different constraints, involving fixed values of particle numbers. Then one often finds, as indicated in our original paper, stable states of the kind we claimed.
Comment on “Bulk-Driven Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions in a Mesoscopic Ring”

Rui Jiang,Wei Huang,Mao-Bin Hu,Yao-Ming Yuan,Qing-Song Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.106.079601

IF: 8.6

2011-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Comment on the Letter by Hauke Hinsch and Erwin Frey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 095701 (2006). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 13 December 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.079601© 2011 American Physical Society
Reply to comment in <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1802.01382" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01382">arXiv:1802.01382</a>

T. P. Xiong,L. L. Yan,F. Zhou,K. Rehan,D. F. Liang,L. Chen,W. L. Yang,Z. H. Ma,M. Feng,V. Vedral

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.02392

2018-08-05

Abstract:Here we respond to a comment [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1802.01382" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01382">arXiv:1802.01382</a>] submitted recently on 'Experimental Verification of a Jarzynski-Related Information-Theoretic Equality by a Single Trapped Ion' PRL 120 010601 (2018). We consider that the argument is the thermalization in a quantum system, which is different from the counterpart in conventional thermodynamics.

Quantum Physics
Comment on "Invalidation of the Kelvin Force in Ferrofluids"

A. Engel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4978

2001-01-24

Abstract:It is shown that the experimental results reported in <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="cond-mat/0010412" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0010412">cond-mat/0010412</a> do not invalidate the well-known expression for the Kelvin force density in ferrofluids.

Materials Science
Xu, Wang, and Hu Reply:

N Xu,L Wang,XW Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.85.4838

IF: 8.6

2000-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by William C. Moss.Received 17 November 1999DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4838©2000 American Physical Society
Comment on "A continuous topological phase transition between 1D antiferromagnetic spin-1 boson superfluids" by W. Ji and X.-G. Wen

A. M. Tsvelik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1811.01653

2018-11-05

Abstract:This is a comment on the preprint <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1809.07771v2" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.07771v2">arXiv:1809.07771v2</a> by W. Ji and X.-G. Wen.

Strongly Correlated Electrons

Comment on “magnus and Iordanskii Forces in Superfluids”

Comment on "Magnus force and acoustic Stewart-Tolman effect in type-II superconductors, by Fil et al

Reply to Comment on "Quantum Force in a Superconductor"

Wexleret Al.reply:

Comment on “melting Line of Hydrogen at High Pressures”

Qin Et Al. Reply

Comment On "Ferroelectric Order Of Parallel Bistable Hydrogen Bonds"

Comment on "electrostatic and Magnetic Transport of Energetic Ions in Turbulent Plasmas".

Reply to the Comment of den Hartog and van Wees on "Conductance Fluctuations in Mesoscopic Normal-Metal/Superconductor Samples"

Reply to "Comment on 'Precision measurement of the Casimir-Lifshitz force in a fluid'"

Comment on “High-Pressure Melting Curve of Nitrogen and the Liquid-Liquid Phase Transition”

Gao et al. Reply

Is There Coexistence of Itinerant Ferromagnetism Ands-Wave Superconductivity?

Comment On "High-Pressure Melting Curve Of Nitrogen And The Liquid-Liquid Phase Transition"

Comment on "Transverse Force on a Quantized Vortex in a Superfluid"

Comment on "Superfluidity in the interior-gap states"

Comment on “Bulk-Driven Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions in a Mesoscopic Ring”

Reply to comment in <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1802.01382" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01382">arXiv:1802.01382</a>

Comment on "Invalidation of the Kelvin Force in Ferrofluids"

Xu, Wang, and Hu Reply:

Comment on "A continuous topological phase transition between 1D antiferromagnetic spin-1 boson superfluids" by W. Ji and X.-G. Wen