Abstract:We review and re-examine the description and separation of the spin and orbital angular momenta (AM) of an electromagnetic field in free space. While the spin and orbital AM of light are not separately meaningful physical quantities in orthodox quantum mechanics or classical field theory, these quantities are routinely measured and used for applications in optics. A meaningful quantum description of the spin and orbital AM of light was recently provided by several authors, which describes separately conserved and measurable integral values of these quantities. However, the electromagnetic field theory still lacks corresponding locally conserved spin and orbital AM currents. In this paper, we construct these missing spin and orbital AM densities and fluxes that satisfy the proper continuity equations. We show that these are physically measurable and conserved quantities. These are, however, not Lorentz-covariant, so only make sense in the single laboratory reference frame of the measurement probe. The fluxes we derive improve the canonical (nonconserved) spin and orbital AM fluxes, and include a ‘spin–orbit’ term that describes the spin–orbit interaction effects observed in nonparaxial optical fields. We also consider both standard and dual-symmetric versions of the electromagnetic field theory. Applying the general theory to nonparaxial optical vortex beams validates our results and allows us to discriminate between earlier approaches to the problem. Our treatment yields the complete and consistent description of the spin and orbital AM of free Maxwell fields in both quantum-mechanical and field-theory approaches.

Comment to the Article "On the Time Integral of Electromagnetic Field" by R.M. Feshchenko (J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 136, 406 (2023))

Reply to the Comment on the Article "On the Time Integral of Electromagnetic Field" (J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 136, 406 (2023))

Comment On "Electromagnetic Radiation Under Explicit Symmetry Breaking" Reply

Comment on "Electromagnetic Radiation under Explicit Symmetry Breaking"

Response to the Comment on "Paradox of Photons Disconnected Trajectories Being Located by Means of "Weak Measurements" in the Nested Mach-Zehnder Interferometer" (JETP Letters 105, 152 (2017))

Reply to "Comment on 'Theoretical analysis of the force on the end face of a nano-filament exerted by an outgoing light pulse'"

Comment on 'Electromagnetic lensing using the Aharonov-Bohm effect'

Some problem with the Lorentz transformations of energy and momentum of the electromagnetic field

Comment on "electrostatic and Magnetic Transport of Energetic Ions in Turbulent Plasmas".

Revisiting the controversy over the time-dependent Aharonov-Bohm effect

Reply to "Comment on 'Ultracold plasma expansion in quadrupole magnetic field' "

On certain paradoxical properties of Einstein photon fields and Dirac electron-positron fields

Comments on the article 'M.O. Katanaev, Complete separation of variables in the geodesic Hamilton-Jacobi equation in four dimensions, Physica Scripta (2023), 98, 104001'

To consider the electromagnetic field as fundamental, and the metric only as a subsidiary field

A New Energy Conservation Law for Time-Harmonic Electromagnetic Fields and Its Applications

Comment on "Magnetoplasmons in a 2D electron fluid: Disk geometry"

Reply to "Comment on 'Fano resonance for Anderson Impurity Systems' "

Comment on Quantum Interference between Light Sources Separated by 150 Million Kilometers Deng et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 123, 080401 (2019)

Conservation of the spin and orbital angular momenta in electromagnetism

On the ambiguity of solutions of the system of the Maxwell equations

Reply to "Comment on 'Precision measurement of the Casimir-Lifshitz force in a fluid'"