Abstract:Who wants to know? Teachers, pupils and policy-makers are keen to know how best to teach and learn argumentative writing at Key Stages 2 and 3 in the National Curriculum. Difficulties with such writing are well-known. What did we find? Results showed that certain conditions have to be in place to create a climate for successful practice. These are not specific to argumentative writing but include: a writing process model in which students are encouraged to plan, draft, edit and revise their writing; self-motivation; some degree of cognitive reasoning training in addition to the natural cognitive development that takes place with maturation; peer collaboration, thus modelling a dialogue that (it is hoped) will become internal and constitute ‘thought’; and explicit and very clear explanations for students of the processes to be learned. The specific strategies identified that have contributed to successful practice in teaching and learning with regard to argumentative writing for 7–14 year olds include: ‘heuristics’, i.e. scaffolding of structures and devices that aid the composition of argumentative writing – in particular, planning, which can include examining a question, brainstorming, organizing and sequencing ideas and evaluating; planning which is extensive, elaborated and hierarchical the use of oral argument, counterargument and rebuttal to inform written argument the identification of explicit goals (including audiences) for writing teacher modelling of argumentative writing; and ‘procedural facilitation’, i.e. coaching by teaching through the process of writing argument. How did we get these results? Via an EPPI-Centre systematic review conducted in collaboration with policy-makers and teacher educators. The review question was: What is the evidence for successful practice in teaching and learning with regard to non-fiction writing (specifically argumentative writing) for 7-14 year olds? What are the implications? The results from this review suggest that more work needs to be undertaken at Key Stage 2, in particular, to develop argumentative writing by linking it to critical thinking and other approaches which aim to encourage reasoning. While argument has a more secure place in the National Curriculum than in 1990, it needs to continue to be encouraged and developed; and more research needs to be undertaken to determine how best to teach it. This report should be cited as: Andrews R, Torgerson C, Low G, McGuinn N, Robinson A (2006) Teaching argumentative non-fi ction writing to 7–14 year olds: a systematic review of the evidence of successful practice. Technical report. In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.

Empowering Education: Teaching Argumentative Writing to Cultural Minority Middle-School Students

Analyzing Critical Thinking Elements in the Argument Structure of Non-English-Major Chinese Undergraduate Students' Writing

Argumentation Across the Curriculum

Let’s Argue: Developing Argumentative Writing Skills for Students with Learning Disabilities

Effects of Historical Reasoning Instruction and Writing Strategy Mastery in Culturally and Academically Diverse Middle School Classrooms.

Structuring written arguments in primary and secondary school: A systemic functional linguistics perspective

Teaching argument writing in math class: challenges and solutions to improve the performance of 4th and 5th graders with disabilities

Teaching middle school students with learning disabilities argumentative writing using SRSD with technology supports

Development of Argumentative Writing Ability in EFL Middle School Students

A scaffolding tool to assist learners in argumentative writing

Argumentation skills mediate the effect of peer argumentation on content knowledge in middle-school students.

Students’ Argumentative Writing Proficiency at Two High-Performing, Traditional Secondary Schools in Trinidad and Tobago

Dialogic literary argumentation and close reading: effects on high school students' literature-related argumentative writing and motivational beliefs

Taking Stock of a Genre-Based Pedagogy: Sustaining the Development of EFL Students’ Knowledge of the Elements in Argumentation and Writing Improvement

Does a Process-Genre Approach Help Improve Students’ Argumentative Writing in English as a Foreign Language? Findings From an Intervention Study

An Investigation into the Development of Structure and Evidence Use in Argumentative Writing

Exploring young children’s argumentation as a heuristic intertextual practice

An Exploratory Study of Argumentative Writing by Young Students: A Transformer-based Approach

Argumentation-Based Learning and P4C Approach: A Seventh-Grade Study on Socio-Scientific Issues

Teaching argumentative non-fiction writing to 7–14 year olds: a systematic review of the evidence of successful practice

Peer Instruction in a Flipped Learning Environment: Investigating ESL Students’ Critical Thinking Performance in Argumentative Essay Writing