Abstract:Background: Research with college students has supported a model of writing approaches that defines the relationship between a writer and writing task along a deep and surface process continuum (Biggs, 1988). Based on that model, Lavelle (1993) developed the Inventory of Processes in College Composition which reflects students' motives and strategies as related to writing outcomes. It is also important to define the approaches of secondary students to better understand writing processes at that level, and development in written composition. Aims: This study was designed to define the writing approaches of secondary students by factor analysing students' responses to items regarding writing beliefs and writing strategies, and to compare the secondary approaches to those of college students. A related goal was to explore the relationships of the secondary writing approaches to perceived self-regulatory efficacy for writing (Zimmerman & Bandura, 1994), writing preferences, and writing outcomes. Samples: The initial, factor analytic phase involved 398 junior level high school students (11th grade) enrolled in a mandatory language arts class at each of three large Midwestern high schools (USA). Then, 49 junior level students enrolled in two language arts classes participated as subjects in the second phase. Method: Classroom teachers administered the Inventory of Processes in College Composition (Lavelle, 1993), which contained 72 true-or-false items regarding writing beliefs and strategies, during regular class periods. Data were factor analysed and the structure compared to that of college students. In the second phase, the new inventory, Inventory of Processes in Secondary Composition, was administered in conjunction with the Perceived Self-Regulatory Efficacy for Writing Inventory (Zimmerman & Bandura, 1994), and a writing preferences survey. A writing sample and grade in Language Arts classes were obtained and served as outcome variables. Results: The factor structure of secondary writing reflected three process dimensions. The first factor, Elaborative-Expressive, describes a writing strategy based on personal investment and audience concern. The second factor, Planful-Procedural, denotes sticking to a plan, following the rules, and 'preparing' for writing. Achieving-Competitive, the third factor, reflects a 'teacher pleasing' strategy or doing only what needs to be done to get a good grade. Two factors from the college model, Elaborative and Procedural, were replicated, and two were not, Reflective-Revision and Low Self-Efficacy. Regression analyses supported that the processes in writing under a timed condition are different from those used when writing over time, and that students' perceptions of writing self-regulatory efficacy were predictive of writing success under both conditions.

Structuring written arguments in primary and secondary school: A systemic functional linguistics perspective

Analyzing Critical Thinking Elements in the Argument Structure of Non-English-Major Chinese Undergraduate Students' Writing

Teaching argumentative non-fiction writing to 7–14 year olds: a systematic review of the evidence of successful practice

The Analysis of Schematic Structure in Students’ Argumentative Essays

An Investigation into the Development of Structure and Evidence Use in Argumentative Writing

Let’s Argue: Developing Argumentative Writing Skills for Students with Learning Disabilities

The writing approaches of secondary students

An investigation into secondary teachers’ views of argumentation in science and religious education

Systemic functional linguistics, teacher education, and writing outcomes for U.S. elementary English learners: A review of the literature

An Exploratory Study of Argumentative Writing by Young Students: A Transformer-based Approach

Linguistic Feature Development Across Grades and Genre in Elementary Writing

Argumentation Across the Curriculum

Adopting an SFL Approach to Teaching L2 Writing through the Teaching Learning Cycle

Students’ Argumentative Writing Proficiency at Two High-Performing, Traditional Secondary Schools in Trinidad and Tobago

The Sensitivity of a Scenario-Based Assessment of Written Argumentation to School Differences in Curriculum and Instruction

Teaching and learning critical literacy at secondary school: the importance of metacognition

Improving English Persuasive Writing in Malaysia: A Recommendation

A scaffolding tool to assist learners in argumentative writing

Write, talk and rewrite: the effectiveness of a dialogic writing intervention in upper elementary education

Informing Academic Writing Pedagogy through the Study of Phrase-frames

A School Student Essay Corpus for Analyzing Interactions of Argumentative Structure and Quality