Abstract:The capacity to make effective argumentation in English writing is considered as a crucial ability in the field of second language writing. Currently, Chinese teachers of English as a foreign language (EFL) adopt the product approach to teach argumentative writing, in which they stress the mode of learners’ written production and show little concern with cognition. For students’ sustainable development in argumentation skills, teachers are encouraged to employ a genre-based approach to cultivate students’ knowledge about different elements in argumentation. However, few empirical studies have investigated the efficacy of such classroom-based instruction on learners’ comprehensive development in EFL writing, including their knowledge about writing and performance in producing argumentation. This is particularly the case with reference to Chinese students learning to write argumentative texts in EFL. To fill the research gap, this quasi-experimental study was conducted with 74 EFL sophomores, who were randomly allocated to either an experimental group or a comparison group. The experimental group received a genre-based writing approach, while the comparison group experienced their conventional writing instruction. Students’ changes were analysed using pre- and post-writing test measures, open-ended questionnaires, and stimulated recall interviews. Our findings revealed more changes in the experimental groups’ knowledge about argumentation following the genre-based writing treatment than the comparison group. Specifically, the experimental group’s progress was obvious in the way they displayed their knowledge of the structure of discourse moves and of language features specific to the argumentative genre. They began to express their knowledge of the content, process, intended purposes, and audience awareness towards producing more genre appropriate texts in argumentation. They also showed enhanced self-reflection on their knowledge of argumentation. In addition, the genre-based approach had a positive effect on the experimental group’s argumentative writing development, as evidenced in their use of discourse move structures and their overall writing quality improvement. The conventional writing approach was not as effective in helping students to write an argumentation. Writing proficiency effects were observed in terms of the extent to which the students were developed. Pedagogical implications and limitations are also discussed.

Analyzing Critical Thinking Elements in the Argument Structure of Non-English-Major Chinese Undergraduate Students' Writing

Exploring College Students’ Depth and Processing Patterns of Critical Thinking Skills and Their Perception in Argument Map(am)-Supported Online Group Debate Activities

Exploring the Effects of Argument Map-Supported Online Group Debate Activities on College Students' Critical Thinking

The Analysis of Argument-Counterargument Structure in Chinese EFL Learners’ Argumentative Writing

Critical Thinking and Argumentative Writing: Inspecting the Association among EFL Learners in China

An Investigation into the Development of Structure and Evidence Use in Argumentative Writing

An empirical study on the scaffolding Chinese university students' English argumentative writing based on toulmin model

The Analysis of Schematic Structure in Students’ Argumentative Essays

Analyzing Culture-Specific Argument Structures in Learner Essays.

Metacognitive writing strategies, critical thinking skills, and academic writing performance: A structural equation modeling approach

Insight from the association between critical thinking and English argumentative writing: catering to English learners’ writing ability

Teaching critical thinking to Chinese students in English as a foreign language writing class: A review

Rhetorical Structure Analysis of Prepared Speeches and Argumentative Essays by Chinese Advanced English Learners

Taking Stock of a Genre-Based Pedagogy: Sustaining the Development of EFL Students’ Knowledge of the Elements in Argumentation and Writing Improvement

Gender Differences in Critical Thinking and Strategy Use in English Writing from Sources among Chinese EFL Undergraduates

No College Students Left Behind: Writing Module Incorporating Critical Thinking Skills for the National Postgraduate Entrance Examination in China

The Research on Critical Thinking Teaching Strategies in College English Classroom

Students' Critical Thinking on Argumentative Essay Writing through Cooperative Learning

A Probe into the Integrated Learning Model of Academic English “Writing + Critical Thinking” in Sino-Foreign Joint Education

The Influence of Reading Texts on L2 Reading-to-Write Argumentative Writing

NEEDS ASSESSMENT REPORT ADOPTING A MIXED-METHOD DESIGN: CHINESE POSTGRADUATES’ IMPRESSIONS OF CRITICAL THINKING APPROACH IN RESEARCH METHOD COURSE