Abstract:Although argument maps (AM) have been proven to be an effective tool for visually presenting arguments and enhancing students' critical thinking skills, the time available for argumentation in traditional face -to -face environments is often limited. Additionally, AMs are typically created by group members from the same side, with few conflicting views. In this study, 17 sophomores majoring in education were divided into four groups, with each group consisting of pros and cons. These groups participated in debates centred around analysing scientific papers. Using a collaborative online platform called 'ZJUYuQue', all the groups engaged in six online group debate activities, anonymously and simultaneously creating AMs. To examine the depth and processing patterns of college students' critical thinking skills in these activities, both content analysis and lag sequence analysis (LSA) were employed to analyse the quality of the debates. Additionally, interviews were conducted with eight participants to explore their perceptions of this instructional design. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the interview data. Results indicated that: first, students' depth of critical thinking skills increased gradually across the six activities, and second that three processing patterns of critical thinking skills emerged: Recognise -> Understand, Evaluate -> Recognise and Create -> Understand. This suggests that students typically identified certain issues with supporting facts and criticised opposing arguments, while also proposing creative ideas during the debates. Lastly, the interviews showed the AM-supported online group debates were appreciated. The online environment provided ample time for students to express their thoughts, while the AMs encouraged clear articulation of arguments. Several implications were highlighted based on these findings. Instructors should provide timely feedback during students' debate, the number of debate topics should be appropriate, and the value of professional knowledge and debating skills should be emphasized.

Let’s Argue: Developing Argumentative Writing Skills for Students with Learning Disabilities

Teaching middle school students with learning disabilities argumentative writing using SRSD with technology supports

Analyzing Critical Thinking Elements in the Argument Structure of Non-English-Major Chinese Undergraduate Students' Writing

Exploring College Students’ Depth and Processing Patterns of Critical Thinking Skills and Their Perception in Argument Map(am)-Supported Online Group Debate Activities

Teaching argument writing in math class: challenges and solutions to improve the performance of 4th and 5th graders with disabilities

The Effects of a Cognitive Apprenticeship Model on the Argumentative Texts of EFL Learners

Improving persuasive writing skills of high school students with specific learning disabilities: STOP and DARE strategy

Using Self-Regulated Strategy Development for Persuasive Writing to Increase the Writing and Self-Efficacy Skills of Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders in Health Class

Answering the challenge: SRSD instruction for close reading of text to write to persuade with 4th and 5th Grade students experiencing writing difficulties

Write, talk and rewrite: the effectiveness of a dialogic writing intervention in upper elementary education

Writing expository essays from social studies texts: a self-regulated strategy development study

Effects of SRSD With Social Skills Prompts on the Writing Skills and Problem Behaviors of Students With Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

Debate pedagogy as a conducive environment for L2 argumentative essay writing

The Short-Term and Maintenance Effects of Self-Regulated Strategy Development in Writing for Middle School Students

Structuring written arguments in primary and secondary school: A systemic functional linguistics perspective

A College Entrance Essay Exam Intervention for Students With High-Incidence Disabilities and Struggling Writers

Promoting Strategic Writing by Postsecondary Students with Learning Disabilities: A Report of Three Case Studies

Improving Persuasive Writing Outcomes With Technology for Students in an Alternative Special Education Program

Writing in Elementary Students With Language-Based Learning Disabilities: A Pilot Study to Examine Feasibility and Promise

Reverse Engineering the Initial Steps of the Writing Process for Students with Learning Disabilities

A scaffolding tool to assist learners in argumentative writing