Abstract:Debate has been warranted as a meaningful activity to promote students' higher-level thinking, such as critical thinking. However, traditional debate activities which are typically carried out in the physical classroom may meet some obstructions of limited time and space, which would result in the phenomenon that many participants act as silent watchers rather than mind exchangers. Moreover, it is hard to make a visualized record about the whole process and contents of the traditional debate activity. The current study aimed to explore the effects of argument map (AM)-supported online group debate activities on college students' critical thinking, including their depth and phases of critical thinking, and the relationship between students' depth of critical thinking and their number of speeches. In the study, an innovative argumentation construction way was designed. All students enrolled in a course could have a chance to attend the AM-supported online group debate activities and the whole process and outcomes of online group debate could be visualized by AM. At the same time, the effectiveness of the innovative activities was evaluated by content analysis of AM. A total of 42 sophomores in the undergraduate course named "Learning Sciences and Technology" were recruited to attend online group debate activities assisted by a web-based visualization tool named "ZJU Yuque" in 5 weeks. Newman's framework about the depth of critical thinking and Murthy's instrument of critical thinking phases were employed as guidelines. We found that 42 students' overall depth of critical thinking was gradually improved in an obvious way during the five online debate activities. The most frequent phases for students in the first and second team in online group debate activities include Understand -> Understand (U -> U), Recognize -> Understand (R -> U), and Understand -> Evaluate (U -> E). However, students' creating behaviors were not significantly generated. Teachers' real-time feedback was helpful for students' improvements of high-level thinking skills and their preparation for the next debate activity. Students' interviews found that students highly valued such online group debate activities because every student could have a chance to express their thoughts and they had enough time to prepare debate contents. Based on the findings, some implications were proposed for the better design and implementation of online group debate activities.

Peer Instruction in a Flipped Learning Environment: Investigating ESL Students’ Critical Thinking Performance in Argumentative Essay Writing

Exploring the Effects of Argument Map-Supported Online Group Debate Activities on College Students' Critical Thinking

Enhancing students critical thinking skills in writing by promoting ESP-based language learning environment

The Impact of Flipped Classroom Instructional Model in Teaching English as a Second Language (ESL) Among Lower Secondary Pupils

The Effect of the flipped classroom on reflective thinking, academic self-efficacy, and achievement motivation in language learners in intermediate level

Improving EFL Learners’ Critical Thinking Skills in Argumentative Writing

Investigating the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Undergraduate Students

Self vs. peer assessment activities in EFL-speaking classes: impacts on students’ self-regulated learning, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills

Effects of using inquiry-based learning on EFL students’ critical thinking skills

FLIPPED CLASSROOM LEARNING INNOVATION AND CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY OF STUDENTS ON ARGUMENTATION WRITING SKILLS

Utilizing Critical and Creativity Thinking to Enhance ESL Grammar and Vocabulary in Narrative Essay Writing among Malaysian Form-Four Learners

Use of Figuratives, Proverbs, and Words of Wisdom in Argumentative Writing: The Strategic Learning of Higher Order Thinking Skills Among Students

Improving Low Proficiency ESL Primary School Students’ Writing Skills using Flipped Classroom

The Impact of Peer Feedback on Chinese EFL Junior High School Students’ Writing Performance

Enhancing English reading skills and self-regulated learning through online collaborative flipped classroom: a comparative study

To peer or not to peer: A controlled peer-editing intervention measuring writing self-efficacy in South Korean higher education

The Effectiveness of Internet-based Peer Feedback Training on Chinese EFL College Students' Writing Proficiency

The flipped classroom approach in an English for specific purposes (ESP) course: A quasi-experimental study on learners’ self-efficacy, study process, and learning performances

The effect of implementing a critical thinking intervention program on English language learners’ critical thinking, reading comprehension, and classroom climate

Investigating Effects of Integrated Reading and Writing Skills Instruction in Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in EFL Classroom

Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills and Communication Skills through Flipped Learning Technology in Moroccan Middle Schools