Abstract:The presence, magnitude, and significance of sex differences in the human brain are hotly debated topics in the scientific community and popular media. This debate is largely fueled by studies containing strong, opposing conclusions: either little to no evidence exists for sex differences in human neuroanatomy, or there are small-to-moderate differences in the size of certain brain regions that are highly reproducible across cohorts (even after controlling for sex differences in average brain size). Our Commentary uses the specific comparison between two recent large-scale studies that adopt these opposing views—namely the review by Eliot and colleagues (2021) and the direct analysis of ~ 40k brains by Williams and colleagues (2021)—in an effort to clarify this controversy and provide a framework for conducting this research. First, we review observations that motivate research on sex differences in human neuroanatomy, including potential causes (evolutionary, genetic, and environmental) and effects (epidemiological and clinical evidence for sex-biased brain disorders). We also summarize methodological and empirical support for using structural MRI to investigate such patterns. Next, we outline how researchers focused on sex differences can better specify their study design (e.g., how sex was defined, if and how brain size was adjusted for) and results (by e.g., distinguishing sexual dimorphisms from sex differences). We then compare the different approaches available for studying sex differences across a large number of individuals: direct analysis, meta-analysis, and review. We stress that reviews do not account for methodological differences across studies, and that this variation explains many of the apparent inconsistencies reported throughout recent reviews (including the work by Eliot and colleagues). For instance, we show that amygdala volume is consistently reported as male-biased in studies with sufficient sample sizes and appropriate methods for brain size correction. In fact, comparing the results from multiple large direct analyses highlights small, highly reproducible sex differences in the volume of many brain regions (controlling for brain size). Finally, we describe best practices for the presentation and interpretation of these findings. Care in interpretation is important for all domains of science, but especially so for research on sex differences in the human brain, given the existence of broad societal gender-biases and a history of biological data being used justify sexist ideas. As such, we urge researchers to discuss their results from simultaneously scientific and anti-sexist viewpoints.

Sex versus gender associations with brain structure

Interactive Effects of Gender and Sexual Orientation on Cortical Thickness, Surface Area and Gray Matter Volume: a Structural Brain MRI Study.

Sex Differences in the Adult Human Brain: Evidence from 5216 UK Biobank Participants

Brain functional connectivity, but not neuroanatomy, captures the interrelationship between sex and gender in preadolescents

Sex differences in brain gray and white matter in healthy young adults: Correlations with resting state ALFF

Novel findings from 2,838 Adult Brains on Sex Differences in Gray Matter Brain Volume

Sex Differences in Human Brain Structure at Birth

Non-overlapping and Inverse Associations Between the Sexes in Structural Brain-Trait Associations

Sex, gender diversity, and brain structure in early adolescence

Different cortical connectivities in human females and males relate to differences in strength and body composition, reward and emotional systems, and memory

Sex Dimorphic Cortical Brain Volumes Associated with Antisocial Behavior in Young Adults.

Sex differences in functional cortical organization reflect differences in network topology rather than cortical morphometry

Brain connectivity: gender makes a difference.

Gender Differences Are Encoded Differently in the Structure and Function of the Human Brain Revealed by Multimodal MRI

Gender Identification of Human Cortical 3-D Morphology Using Hierarchical Sparsity.

Sex Differences in Cortical Morphometry and White Matter Microstructure During Brain Aging and Their Relationships to Cognition

Sex and mental health are related to subcortical brain microstructure

Sex-related human brain asymmetry in hemispheric functional gradients

Sex differences in the human brain: a roadmap for more careful analysis and interpretation of a biological reality

Sex differences in intrinsic functional cortical organization reflect differences in network topology rather than cortical morphometry

Sex-by-age differences in the resting-state brain connectivity