Sex, gender diversity, and brain structure in early adolescence

Carinna Torgerson,Hedyeh Ahmadi,Jeiran Choupan,Chun Chieh Fan,John R. Blosnich,Megan M. Herting
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26671
IF: 4.8
2024-04-10
Human Brain Mapping
Abstract:GRAPHICAL ABSTRCT This study used linear mixed effects modeling to determine whether a model with sex, gender, or a combination of both captured the most variance in regional brain structure for children ages 9–11. The sex model (M1) accounted for the most variance in the majority of regions. There remains little consensus about the relationship between sex and brain structure, particularly in early adolescence. Moreover, few pediatric neuroimaging studies have analyzed both sex and gender as variables of interest—many of which included small sample sizes and relied on binary definitions of gender. The current study examined gender diversity with a continuous felt‐gender score and categorized sex based on X and Y allele frequency in a large sample of children ages 9–11 years old (N = 7195). Then, a statistical model‐building approach was employed to determine whether gender diversity and sex independently or jointly relate to brain morphology, including subcortical volume, cortical thickness, gyrification, and white matter microstructure. Additional sensitivity analyses found that male versus female differences in gyrification and white matter were largely accounted for by total brain volume, rather than sex per se. The model with sex, but not gender diversity, was the best‐fitting model in 60.1% of gray matter regions and 61.9% of white matter regions after adjusting for brain volume. The proportion of variance accounted for by sex was negligible to small in all cases. While models including felt‐gender explained a greater amount of variance in a few regions, the felt‐gender score alone was not a significant predictor on its own for any white or gray matter regions examined. Overall, these findings demonstrate that at ages 9–11 years old, sex accounts for a small proportion of variance in brain structure, while gender diversity is not directly associated with neurostructural diversity.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,neurosciences,neuroimaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?