Sex differences in deep brain shape and asymmetry persist across schizophrenia and healthy individuals: A meta-analysis from the ENIGMA-Schizophrenia Working Group
Delaina B Cimmino,Brinley Zabriskie,Steven Luke,Boris Gutman,Dmitry Isaev,Kathryn Alpert,David Glahn,Amanda Rodrigue,Sinead Kelly,Godfrey Pearlson,Vince Calhoun,Stefan Ehrlich,Ole Andreassen,Diana Tordesillas-Gutierrez,Benedicto Crespo-Facorro,Theodore Satterthwaite,Raquel Gur,Ruben Gur,Gianfranco Spalletta,Fabrizio Piras,Gary Donohoe,Colm McDonald,Edith Pomarol-Clotet,Raymond Salvador,Andriana Karuk,Aristotle Voineskos,Peter Kochunov,Stefan Borgwardt,Ingrid Agartz,Erik Jonsson,Tilo Kircher,Frederike Stein,Katharina Brosch,Igor Nenadic,Felice Iasevoli,Giuseppe Pontillo,Andrea de Bartolomeis,Annarita Barone,Maraiateresa Ciccarelli,Annabella Di Giorgio,Arturo Brunetti,Sirio Cocozza,Mario Tranfa,Anthony James,Mojtaba Zarei,Morgan Hough,Lena Flyckt,Geraldo Busatto,Pedro G.P. Rosa,Mauricio H. Serpa,Marcus V. Zanetti,Theo van Erp,Adrian Preda,Dana Nguyen,Paul Thompson,Jessica Turner,Lei Wang,Derin Cobia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.619733
2024-10-26
Abstract:Background: Schizophrenia (SCZ) is characterized by a disconnect from reality that manifests as various clinical and cognitive symptoms, and persistent neurobiological abnormalities. Sex-related differences in clinical presentation imply separate brain substrates. The present study characterized deep brain morphology using shape features to understand the independent effects of diagnosis and sex on the brain, and to determine whether the neurobiology of schizophrenia varies as a function of sex. Methods: This study analyzed multi-site archival data from 1,871 male (M) and 955 female (F) participants with SCZ, and 2,158 male and 1,877 female healthy controls (CON) from twenty-three cross-sectional samples from the ENIGMA Schizophrenia Workgroup. Harmonized shape analysis protocols were applied to each site's data for seven deep brain regions obtained from T1-weighted structural MRI scans. Effect sizes were calculated for the following main contrasts: 1) Sex effects; 2) Diagnosis-by-Sex interaction; 3) within sex tests of diagnosis; 4) within diagnosis tests of sex differences. Meta-regression models between brain structure and clinical variables were also computed separately in men and women with schizophrenia. Results: Mass univariate meta-analyses revealed more concave-than-convex shape differences in all regions for women relative to men, across diagnostic groups (d = -0.35 to 0.20, SE = 0.02 to 0.07); there were no significant diagnosis-by-sex interaction effects. Within men and women separately, we identified more-concave-than-convex shape differences for the hippocampus, amygdala, accumbens, and thalamus, with more-convex-than-concave differences in the putamen and pallidum in SCZ (d = -0.30 to 0.30, SE = 0.03 to 0.10). Within CON and SZ separately, we found more-concave-than-convex shape differences in the thalamus, pallidum, putamen, and amygdala among females compared to males, with mixed findings in the hippocampus and caudate (d = -0.30 to 0.20, SE = 0.03 to 0.09). Meta-regression models revealed similarly small, but significant relationships, with medication and positive symptoms in both SCZ-M and SCZ-F. Conclusions: Sex-specific variation is an overriding feature of deep brain shape regardless of disease status, underscoring persistent patterns of sex differences observed both within and across diagnostic categories, and highlighting the importance of including it as a critical variable in studies of neurobiology. Future work should continue to explore these dimensions independently to determine whether these patterns of brain morphology extend to other aspects of neurobiology in schizophrenia, potentially uncovering broader implications for diagnosis and treatment.
Neuroscience