More similarity than difference: comparison of within- and between-sex variance in early adolescent brain structure

Carinna Torgerson,Katherine L Bottenhorn,Hedyeh Ahmadi,Jeiran Choupan,Megan M Herting

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.15.608129

2024-08-19

Abstract:Adolescent neuroimaging studies of sex differences in the human brain predominantly examine mean differences between males and females. This focus on between-groups differences without probing relative distributions and similarities may contribute to both conflation and overestimation of sex differences and sexual dimorphism in the developing human brain. We aimed to characterize the variance in brain macro- and micro-structure in early adolescence as it pertains to sex at birth using a large sample of 9-11 year-olds from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (N=7,723). Specifically, for global and regional estimates of gray and white matter volume, cortical thickness, and white matter microstructure (i.e., fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity), we examined: within- and between-sex variance, overlap between male and female distributions, inhomogeneity of variance via the Fligner-Killeen test, and an analysis of similarities (ANOSIM). For completeness, we examined these sex differences using both uncorrected (raw) brain estimates and residualized brain estimates after using mixed-effects modeling to account for age, pubertal development, socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, MRI scanner manufacturer, and total brain volume, where applicable. The overlap between male and female distributions was universally greater than the difference (overlap coefficient range: 0.585 - 0.985) and the ratio of within-sex and between-sex differences was similar (ANOSIM R range: -0.001 - 0.117). All cortical and subcortical volumes showed significant inhomogeneity of variance, whereas a minority of brain regions showed significant sex differences in variance for cortical thickness, white matter volume, fractional anisotropy, and mean diffusivity. Inhomogeneity of variance was reduced after accounting for other sources of variance. Overlap coefficients were larger and ANOSIM R values were smaller for residualized outcomes, indicating greater within- and smaller between-sex differences once accounting for other covariates. Reported sex differences in early adolescent human brain structure may be driven by disparities in variance, rather than binary, sex-based phenotypes. Contrary to the popular view of the brain as sexually dimorphic, we found more similarity than difference between sexes in all global and regional measurements of brain structure examined. This study builds upon previous findings illustrating the importance of considering variance when examining sex differences in brain structure.

Neuroscience