Abstract:Introduction: The implementation of evidence-informed policies and practices across systems is a complex, multifaceted endeavor, often requiring the mobilization of multiple organizations from a range of contexts. In order to facilitate this process, policy makers, innovation developers and service deliverers are increasingly calling upon intermediaries to support implementation, yet relatively little is known about precisely how they contribute to implementation. This study examines the role of intermediaries supporting the implementation of evidence-informed policies and practices in the mental health and addictions systems of New Zealand, Ontario, Canada and Sweden. Methods: Using a comparative case study methodology and taking an integrated knowledge translation approach, we drew from established explanatory frameworks and implementation theory to address three questions: (1) Why were the intermediaries established? (2) How are intermediaries structured and what strategies do they use in systems to support the implementation of policy directions? and (3) What explains the lack of use of particular strategies? Data collection included three site visits, 49 key informant interviews and document analysis. Results: In each jurisdiction, a unique set of problems (e.g., negative events involving people with mental illness), policies (e.g., feedback on effectiveness of existing policies) and political events (e.g., changes in government) were coupled by a policy entrepreneur to bring intermediaries onto the decision agenda. While intermediaries varied greatly in their structure and characteristics, both the strategies they used and the strategies they didn't use were surprisingly similar. Specifically it was notable that none of the intermediaries used strategies that directly targeted the public, nor used audit and feedback. This emerged as the principle policy puzzle. Our analysis identified five reasons for these strategies not being employed: (1) their need to build/maintain healthy relationships with policy actors; (2) their need to build/maintain healthy relationships with service delivery system actors; (3) role differentiation with other system actors; (4) perceived lack of "fit" with the role of policy intermediaries; and (5) resource limitations that preclude intensive distributed (program-level) work. Conclusion: Policy makers and implementers must consider capacity to support implementation, and our study identifies how intermediaries can be developed and harnessed to support the implementation process.

How policy growth affects policy implementation: bureaucratic overload and policy triage

Bureaucratic overload and organizational policy triage: A comparative study of implementation agencies in five European countries

Studying implementation beyond deficit analysis: The top-down view reconsidered

Balancing Trade‐Offs between Policy Responsiveness and Effectiveness: The Impact of Vertical Policy‐Process Integration on Policy Accumulation

Moving policy implementation theory forward: A multiple streams/critical juncture approach

Policy implementation: Implications for evaluation

Policy implementation: The organizational challenge

The more the better? Rule growth and policy impact from a macro perspective

Implementing the third generation research paradigm in policy implementation research: An empirical assessment

Linking throughput and output legitimacy in Swiss forest policy implementation

The polity of implementation: Organizational and institutional arrangements in policy implementation

The Implementation of Public Policy: Still the Missing Link

Where is "policy" in dissemination and implementation science? Recommendations to advance theories, models, and frameworks: EPIS as a case example

Differentiated policy implementation in the European Union

Time for a revival? Public policy implementation: a review of the literature and an agenda for future research

Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support programs help?

When Does Cooperation Improve Public Policy Implementation?

An examination of mental health policy implementation efforts and the intermediaries that support them in New Zealand, Canada and Sweden: a comparative case study

Implementing targeted poverty alleviation: a policy implementation typology

Does problem complexity matter for environmental policy delivery? How public authorities address problems of water governance

Structuring Bureaucratic Performance? Assessing the Policy Impact of Environmental Agency Design