Abstract:Background: Implementation science scholars have made significant progress identifying factors that enable or obstruct the implementation of evidence-based interventions, and testing strategies that may modify those factors. However, little research sheds light on how or why strategies work, in what contexts, and for whom. Studying implementation mechanisms-the processes responsible for change-is crucial for advancing the field of implementation science and enhancing its value in facilitating equitable policy and practice change. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality funded a conference series to achieve two aims: (1) develop a research agenda on implementation mechanisms, and (2) actively disseminate the research agenda to research, policy, and practice audiences. This article presents the resulting research agenda, including priorities and actions to encourage its execution. Method: Building on prior concept mapping work, in a semi-structured, 3-day, in-person working meeting, 23 US-based researchers used a modified nominal group process to generate priorities and actions for addressing challenges to studying implementation mechanisms. During each of the three 120-min sessions, small groups responded to the prompt: "What actions need to be taken to move this research forward?" The groups brainstormed actions, which were then shared with the full group and discussed with the support of facilitators trained in structured group processes. Facilitators grouped critical and novel ideas into themes. Attendees voted on six themes they prioritized to discuss in a fourth, 120-min session, during which small groups operationalized prioritized actions. Subsequently, all ideas were collated, combined, and revised for clarity by a subset of the authorship team. Results: From this multistep process, 150 actions emerged across 10 priority areas, which together constitute the research agenda. Actions included discrete activities, projects, or products, and ways to shift how research is conducted to strengthen the study of implementation mechanisms. Conclusions: This research agenda elevates actions to guide the selection, design, and evaluation of implementation mechanisms. By delineating recommended actions to address the challenges of studying implementation mechanisms, this research agenda facilitates expanding the field of implementation science, beyond studying what works to how and why strategies work, in what contexts, for whom, and with which interventions.

Policy implementation: The organizational challenge

Policy implementation: Implications for evaluation

Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support programs help?

Learning From Experience: Lessons From Policy Implementation

The polity of implementation: Organizational and institutional arrangements in policy implementation

Political Analysis for Health Policy Implementation

Moving policy implementation theory forward: A multiple streams/critical juncture approach

Policy implementation and outcome evaluation: establishing a framework and expanding capacity for advocacy organizations to assess the impact of their work in public policy

The Implementation of Public Policy: Still the Missing Link

The Intersection of Nonprofit Roles and Public Policy Implementation

China’s Experience in Public Policy Implementation

How policy growth affects policy implementation: bureaucratic overload and policy triage

Implementation teams: A new lever for organizational change

Challenges in Implementing and Sustaining Community College Organizational Change for Student Success

Interplay between Politics and Institution in Higher Education Reform

Time for a revival? Public policy implementation: a review of the literature and an agenda for future research

Implementing targeted poverty alleviation: a policy implementation typology

Implementing Educational Reform

A research agenda to advance the study of implementation mechanisms

Making change permanent A model for institutionalizing change interventions

What can system dynamics learn from the public policy implementation literature?