Abstract:Introduction: The implementation of evidence-informed policies and practices across systems is a complex, multifaceted endeavor, often requiring the mobilization of multiple organizations from a range of contexts. In order to facilitate this process, policy makers, innovation developers and service deliverers are increasingly calling upon intermediaries to support implementation, yet relatively little is known about precisely how they contribute to implementation. This study examines the role of intermediaries supporting the implementation of evidence-informed policies and practices in the mental health and addictions systems of New Zealand, Ontario, Canada and Sweden. Methods: Using a comparative case study methodology and taking an integrated knowledge translation approach, we drew from established explanatory frameworks and implementation theory to address three questions: (1) Why were the intermediaries established? (2) How are intermediaries structured and what strategies do they use in systems to support the implementation of policy directions? and (3) What explains the lack of use of particular strategies? Data collection included three site visits, 49 key informant interviews and document analysis. Results: In each jurisdiction, a unique set of problems (e.g., negative events involving people with mental illness), policies (e.g., feedback on effectiveness of existing policies) and political events (e.g., changes in government) were coupled by a policy entrepreneur to bring intermediaries onto the decision agenda. While intermediaries varied greatly in their structure and characteristics, both the strategies they used and the strategies they didn't use were surprisingly similar. Specifically it was notable that none of the intermediaries used strategies that directly targeted the public, nor used audit and feedback. This emerged as the principle policy puzzle. Our analysis identified five reasons for these strategies not being employed: (1) their need to build/maintain healthy relationships with policy actors; (2) their need to build/maintain healthy relationships with service delivery system actors; (3) role differentiation with other system actors; (4) perceived lack of "fit" with the role of policy intermediaries; and (5) resource limitations that preclude intensive distributed (program-level) work. Conclusion: Policy makers and implementers must consider capacity to support implementation, and our study identifies how intermediaries can be developed and harnessed to support the implementation process.

Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support programs help?

Policy implementation: The organizational challenge

Policy implementation: Implications for evaluation

Four Keys to Success (Theory, Implementation, Evaluation, and Resource/System Support): High Hopes and Challenges in Participation

Moving policy implementation theory forward: A multiple streams/critical juncture approach

Policy Implementation Science to Advance Population Health: The Potential for Learning Health Policy Systems

What can system dynamics learn from the public policy implementation literature?

Learning From Experience: Lessons From Policy Implementation

An examination of mental health policy implementation efforts and the intermediaries that support them in New Zealand, Canada and Sweden: a comparative case study

Time for a revival? Public policy implementation: a review of the literature and an agenda for future research

The Implementation of Public Policy: Still the Missing Link

Policy implementation and outcome evaluation: establishing a framework and expanding capacity for advocacy organizations to assess the impact of their work in public policy

Documenting the Implementation Gap: Pre-implementation Supports

Mending the gap: Measurement needs to address policy implementation through a health equity lens

What Can Policy-Makers Get Out of Systems Thinking? Policy Partners’ Experiences of a Systems-Focused Research Collaboration in Preventive Health

Understanding the supports needed for policy implementation: a comparative analysis of the placement of intermediaries across three mental health systems

Factors affecting the outcome of corporate sustainability policy: a review paper

How and why do win-win strategies work in engaging policy-makers to implement Health in All Policies? A multiple-case study of six state- and national-level governments

Syncing Strategy and Execution: A Systematic Review of Public Health Preparedness Policy Implementation

Implementation support practitioners – a proposal for consolidating a diverse evidence base

How policy growth affects policy implementation: bureaucratic overload and policy triage