Abstract:Many public environmental decisions are wicked problems due to high complexity and uncertainty. We test a participatory value-based framework based on multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to tackle such problems. Our framework addresses two important gaps identified in reviews of MCDA applications to environmental problems: including stakeholders and treating uncertainty. We applied our framework in two complex real-world cases concerning a paradigm shift in the wastewater sector; the transition from centralized wastewater systems to decentralized non-grid systems. Non-grid systems may solve some problems of centralized systems by reducing costs, increasing flexibility, and addressing growing demands on environmental issues, especially in rural areas. But non-grid systems have rarely been implemented in OECD countries, because it is unclear whether a transition is recommendable, and whether stakeholders would accept this shift. This problem allows addressing several fundamental research questions. As theoretical contribution, we found that stakeholder participation in MCDA is necessary, because different preferences of stakeholders can lead to different best-performing options in the assessments. Compared to the typical integrated assessment (IA) approach that excludes stakeholders' preferences, the MCDA process led to clearer outcomes. Results indicate that including the uncertainty of predicted consequences of options with Monte Carlo simulation helped discriminate between options and identify best-performing options. Challenging the uncertainty of elicited stakeholder preferences with sensitivity analyses, we found that best-performing options were especially sensitive to the MCDA aggregation model. Despite the high uncertainty, it was possible to suggest robust consensus options that would perform reasonably well for all stakeholders. As practical contribution, results indicated that a transition from the centralized to decentralized non-grid systems seems feasible. Most stakeholders assigned highest weights to environmental protection objectives in decision-making workshops. These stakeholder preferences implemented in MCDA led to a generally better assessment of innovative non-grid systems, especially when including urine source separation. Stakeholders perceived the MCDA process as beneficial and found results plausible. We conclude that the proposed participatory value-based framework is rigorous, but still feasible in practice. The framework is certainly transferable to any context and is open to testing and refinement in various applications to wicked decision problems.

Does problem complexity matter for environmental policy delivery? How public authorities address problems of water governance

Consequences of Increasing Environmental Complexity in the Water Domain

Pathways towards improved water governance: The role of polycentric governance systems and vertical and horizontal coordination

The state against the environment? Water management and the regulation of tensions between sectoral policies in France

Agency and constraint in environmental policy coherence

Standing on the shoulders of giants: Understanding changes in urban water practice through the lens of complexity science

Special Issue “Public Policy Analysis of Integrated Water Resource Management”

Why is It Hard to Solve Environmental Problems? the Perils of Institutional Reductionism and Institutional Overload

Improving the socio-ecological fit in water governance by enhancing coordination of ecosystem services used

The understanding, application and influence of complexity in national physical activity policy-making

Digging into Complexity: The Wicked Problem of Peatland Protection

Water Management Across Borders, Scales and Sectors: Recent developments and future challenges in water policy analysis

Mind the gap: Coping with delay in environmental governance

Unravelling the legal labyrinth: Investigating barriers to effective adoption and enforcement of international environmental law in domestic jurisdictions

The complexity of environmental policy implementation in China: a set-theoretic approach to environmental monitoring policy dynamics

Challenges of water environment governance in China: based on a qualitative comparative analysis approach

Structuring Bureaucratic Performance? Assessing the Policy Impact of Environmental Agency Design

Strategies for integrating scientific evidence in water policy and law in the face of uncertainty

Navigating the Wicked Policy Problem: An In-Depth Analysis of Policy Dilemmas and Innovative Approaches for Effective Problem Solving

A participatory multi-criteria decision analysis framework reveals transition potential towards non-grid wastewater management

Revisiting deliberative policy analysis through systemic co-inquiry: some experiences from the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in England