Abstract:According to the new European Commission proposal for a regulation on deforestation-free products, six commodities - cattle, wood, palm oil, soy, cocoa, and coffee and their derivate products – grown or raised on land that was subject to deforestation or forest degradation will be banned from entering the EU market. In this commentary paper, we discuss the possible unintended effects of the regulation and elaborate on potential ways to reduce the negative impacts, on vulnerable groups in producer countries, such as smallholders, Indigenous peoples, and local communities (IPLCs). Such impacts could comprise exclusion of smallholders and IPLCs from high-value supply chains of commodities covered by the regulation, inadequate price premiums to cover the costs of complying with this regulation, increase the risk of land conflicts between large-scale and small-scale agriculture, push smallholders and IPLCs to marginal lands, and even exacerbate human rights risks already associated with large-scale commodity production. In order to avoid or minimize such impacts, we propose: 1) to make provisions for companies, smallholders, and producing regions to receive sufficient support in their transition to deforestation-free supply chains and to provide incentives so that this transition can be inclusive; 2) to further promote and strengthen holistic approaches, such as jurisdictional or other integrated landscape management approaches to address the many issues that can arise from conflicting interests and unequal power distribution in affected landscapes; 3) to make clear provisions for protection of human rights and to promote land rights for smallholders and IPLCs related to tenure security; and 4) to ensure that regular and robust impact assessments inform policy about both direct and indirect impacts of the regulation on smallholders and IPLCs so that timely and adequate action can be taken to minimize the unintended effects of this regulation. Addressing potential negative impacts on smallholders and IPLCs would also ensure that the progress achieved so far in terms of other UN SDGs related to poverty, inequality, hunger, and land restoration is not compromised.

Six research priorities to support corporate due-diligence policies

Towards more sustainable global supply chains? Company compliance with new human rights and environmental due diligence laws

Corporate Social Responsibility due diligence among European companies: The results of an interventionist research project with accountability and political implications

Corporate zero deforestation commitments and company-internal organizational change

Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and the New Boundaries of the Firms in the European Union

Foreign corporate accountability: The contested institutionalization of mandatory due diligence in France and Germany

Integrating human rights in the sustainability governance of global supply chains: Exploring the deforestation-land tenure nexus

Smart mix politics: business actors in the formulation of global supply chain regulation

Supply Chain Due Diligence Risk Assessment for the EU: A Network Approach to estimate expected effectiveness of the planned EU directive

Research priorities for managing the impacts and dependencies of business upon food, energy, water and the environment

Gaps in adoption and implementation limit the current and potential effectiveness of zero-deforestation supply chain policies for soy

Potential impacts of the proposed EU regulation on deforestation-free supply chains on smallholders, indigenous peoples, and local communities in producer countries outside the EU

Academic Literature on Compliance Programs, ESG, Corporate Governance, Fraud Prevention, Human Rights, Corruption, Data Protection, and SDGs

Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence in Germany and Norway: Stepping, or Striding, in the Same Direction?

How well does the implementation of corporate zero-deforestation commitments in Indonesia align with aims to halt deforestation and include smallholders?

Research in the greenwashing field: concepts, theories, and potential impacts on economic and social value

Unearthing the pressures: An assessment of the sustainability focus and supply chain management practices adopted by global oil and gas titans

Corporate sustainability reporting: double materiality, impacts, and legal risk

Sustainability‐related Transgressions in Global Supply Chains: When do Legitimacy Spillovers Hurt Buying Firms the Most?

Barriers to evidence use for sustainability: Insights from pesticide policy and practice

Shaping nature outcomes in corporate settings