Abstract:This paper investigates the financial impact of corporate sustainability greenwashing in the global Technology sector. Using environmental, social and governance (ESG) controversy data spanning between 2014 and 2021, we examine how media-reported conflicts linking companies to dubious sustainability claims influence financing costs. Models estimate effects on weighted average cost of capital, cost of equity, and cost of debt, contrasting overall controversies around issues against strictly environmental cases. Further analysis discriminates between high and low systematic risk technology firms. Results reveal increased overall sustainability controversies are associated with lower equity financing expenses, indicating investors continue value growth prospects despite ethical concerns. However, strict environmental controversies increase all financing costs. Findings suggest visibility of environmental externalities is sufficiently tangible that greenwashing them backfires financially, unlike shadowy social conduct. Additionally, lower systematic risk firms suffer harsher greenwashing penalties, implying resilience to disruption reduces misleading incentives. Transparency is currently inadequate immunisation against greenwashing in the Technology sector, necessitating oversight reforms. Stricter auditing and disclosure requirements would enable investors to accurately price sustainability risk and channel funds toward authentic sustainability transformation. Moreover, Technology companies must credibly convey environmental progress to avoid value destruction from questionable claims. Accordingly, managers should proactively invest in sustainability to mitigate reputation risks and access financing at lower costs. Ultimately, multifaceted transparency and coordinated policy responses are essential to realize genuine sustainability in disruptive, high-impact technologies.

Sustainability‐related Transgressions in Global Supply Chains: When do Legitimacy Spillovers Hurt Buying Firms the Most?

The Spillover Effect of Customers' ESG to Suppliers

Media Coverage and Corporate Risk-Taking: International Evidence

Supply chain spillover effect of media attention to customers from the perspective of real earnings management

Does corporate sustainability mitigate firm risk? An empirical analysis on S&P 500 controversial companies

Toward a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management: the role of media attention

What accounts for the effect of sustainability engagement on stock price crash risk during the COVID-19 pandemic—Agency theory or legitimacy theory?

Seeing through the haze: greenwashing and the cost of capital in technology firms

Norm spillover? How environmental regulation in downstream industries affects upstream corporate environmental disclosure

How Media Coverage of Corporate Social Irresponsibility Increases Financial Risk

Migration of Global Supply Chains: A Real Effect of Mandatory ESG Disclosure

The benefit of virtue signaling: Corporate sleight-of-hand positively influences consumers' judgments about "social license to operate"

Stock Price Overreaction to ESG Controversies

The Impact of Corporate Environmental Violation on Shareholders' Wealth: a Perspective Taken from Media Coverage

Embedding sustainability in risk management: The impact of environmental, social, and governance ratings on corporate financial risk

The Effect of Sustainability Information Disclosure on the Cost of Equity Capital: An Empirical Analysis Based on Gartner Top 50 Supply Chain Rankings

A pathway towards corporate sustainability: Does media attention matter?

The Cost of Corporate Social Irresponsibility for Acquirers

Corporate SDG performance and investor trading behavior

ESG Reputation Risk Matters: An Event Study Based on Social Media Data

Sustainable success: How high ESG ratings affect stock market responses to earnings surprises