Abstract:Background: The global food system is inflicting substantial environmental harm, necessitating a shift towards more environmentally sustainable food consumption practices. Policy interventions, for example, information campaigns, taxes and subsidies and changes in the choice context are essential to stimulate sustainable change, but their effectiveness in achieving environmental goals remains inadequately understood. Existing literature lacks a comprehensive synthesis of evidence on the role of public policies in promoting sustainable food consumption. Our systematic map addressed this gap by collecting and categorising research evidence on public policy interventions aimed at establishing environmentally sustainable food consumption patterns, in order to answer the primary research question: What evidence exists on the effects of public policy interventions for achieving environmentally sustainable food consumption? Methods: Searches for relevant records (in English) were performed in WoS, Scopus, ASSIA, ProQuest Dissertation and Theses, EconLit, Google Scholar and in bibliographies of relevant reviews. A grey literature search was also performed on 28 specialist websites (searches were made in the original language of the webpages and publications in English, Swedish, Danish and Norwegian were eligible) and Google Scholar (search in English). Screening was performed at title/abstract and full-text levels, with machine learning-aided priority screening at title/abstract level. Eligibility criteria encompassed settings, interventions (public policies on sustainable food consumption), target groups and outcomes. No critical appraisal of study validity was conducted. Data coding covered bibliographic details, study characteristics, intervention types and outcomes. Evidence was categorised into intervention types and subcategories. Visual representation utilised bar plots, diagrams, heatmaps and an evidence atlas. This produced a comprehensive overview of effects of public policy interventions on sustainable food consumption patterns. Review findings: The evidence base included 227 articles (267 interventions), with 92% of studies in high-income countries and only 4% in low-income countries. Quantitative studies dominated (83%), followed by mixed methods (16%) and qualitative studies (1%). Most interventions were information-based and 50% of reviewed studies looked at labels. Information campaigns/education interventions constituted 10% of the sample, and menu design changes and restriction/editing of choice context 8% each. Market-based interventions represented 13% of total interventions, of which two-thirds were taxes. Administrative interventions were rare (< 1%). Proxies for environmental impact (85%) were more frequent outcome measures than direct impacts (15%). Animal-source food consumption was commonly used (19%) for effects of interventions on, for example, greenhouse gas emissions. Most studies used stated preferences (61%) to evaluate interventions. Conclusions: The literature assessing policies for sustainable food consumption is dominated by studies on non-intrusive policy instruments; labels, information campaigns, menu design changes and editing choice contexts. There is a strong need for research on sustainable food policies to leave the lab and enter the real world, which will require support and cooperation of public and private sector stakeholders. Impact evaluations of large-scale interventions require scaling-up of available research funding and stronger multidisciplinary research, including collaborations with industry and other societal actors. Future research in this field should also go beyond the European and North American context, to obtain evidence on how to counteract increasing environmental pressures from food consumption worldwide.

Barriers to evidence use for sustainability: Insights from pesticide policy and practice

Agro-ecology Science Relates to Economic Development but Not Global Pesticide Pollution.

Effects of public policy interventions for environmentally sustainable food consumption: a systematic map of available evidence

Legal Barriers in Sustainable Agriculture: Valorization of Agri-Food Waste and Pesticide Use Reduction

Behavioral factors driving farmers' intentions to adopt spot spraying for sustainable weed control

How to bring research evidence into policy? Synthesizing strategies of five research projects in low-and middle-income countries

Aligning evidence generation and use across health, development, and environment

Evidence library of meta-analytical literature assessing the sustainability of agriculture - a dataset

Inequalities in Research on Food Environment Policies: An Evidence Map of Global Evidence from 2010-2020

Improving uptake of evidence on jobs from greening

What evidence exists on the effects of public policy interventions for achieving environmentally sustainable food consumption? A systematic map protocol

Enhancing Scientific Support for the Stockholm Convention's Implementation: An Analysis of Policy Needs for Scientific Evidence

Suggested Use? on Evidence‐based Decision‐making in Industrial Ecology and Beyond

Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy?

Information, motivation and resources: the missing elements in agricultural pesticide policy implementation in Ethiopia

Evidence-based research impact praxis: Integrating scholarship and practice to ensure research benefits society

A systems-based analysis to rethink the European environmental risk assessment of regulated chemicals using pesticides as a pilot case

The ecological and economic benefits of sustainable agricultural practices: Evidence from on-farm trials in broad-acre grain crops

A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers

Measuring pesticides in the atmosphere: current status, emerging trends and future perspectives

Strategies for integrating scientific evidence in water policy and law in the face of uncertainty