Abstract:Over the past decade, a range of sensor technologies became available on the market, enabling a revolutionary shift in air pollution monitoring and assessment. With their cost of up to three orders of magnitude lower than standard/reference instruments, many avenues for applications have opened up. In particular, broader participation in air quality discussion and utilisation of information on air pollution by communities has become possible. However, many questions have been also asked about the actual benefits of these technologies. To address this issue, we conducted a comprehensive literature search including both the scientific and grey literature. We focused upon two questions: (1) Are these technologies fit for the various purposes envisaged? and (2) How far have these technologies and their applications progressed to provide answers and solutions? Regarding the former, we concluded that there is no clear answer to the question, due to a lack of: sensor/monitor manufacturers' quantitative specifications of performance, consensus regarding recommended end-use and associated minimal performance targets of these technologies, and the ability of the prospective users to formulate the requirements for their applications, or conditions of the intended use. Numerous studies have assessed and reported sensor/monitor performance under a range of specific conditions, and in many cases the performance was concluded to be satisfactory. The specific use cases for sensors/monitors included outdoor in a stationary mode, outdoor in a mobile mode, indoor environments and personal monitoring. Under certain conditions of application, project goals, and monitoring environments, some sensors/monitors were fit for a specific purpose. Based on analysis of 17 large projects, which reached applied outcome stage, and typically conducted by consortia of organizations, we observed that a sizable fraction of them (~ 30%) were commercial and/or crowd-funded. This fact by itself signals a paradigm change in air quality monitoring, which previously had been primarily implemented by government organizations. An additional paradigm-shift indicator is the growing use of machine learning or other advanced data processing approaches to improve sensor/monitor agreement with reference monitors. There is still some way to go in enhancing application of the technologies for source apportionment, which is of particular necessity and urgency in developing countries. Also, there has been somewhat less progress in wide-scale monitoring of personal exposures. However, it can be argued that with a significant future expansion of monitoring networks, including indoor environments, there may be less need for wearable or portable sensors/monitors to assess personal exposure. Traditional personal monitoring would still be valuable where spatial variability of pollutants of interest is at a finer resolution than the monitoring network can resolve.

Measuring pesticides in the atmosphere: current status, emerging trends and future perspectives

Future water quality monitoring: improving the balance between exposure and toxicity assessments of real-world pollutant mixtures

Linking chemical surface water monitoring and pesticide regulation in selected European countries

Evaluating the Perceptions of Pesticide Use, Safety, and Regulation and Identifying Common Pesticide-Related Topics on Twitter

Widespread Pesticide Distribution in the European Atmosphere Questions their Degradability in Air

An overview of selected emerging outdoor airborne pollutants and air quality issues: The need to reduce uncertainty about environmental and human impacts

Exposure information in environmental health research: Current opportunities and future directions for particulate matter, ozone, and toxic air pollutants

Occurrence and distribution of pesticides and transformation products in ambient air in two European agricultural areas

How can exposure assessment for pesticides in epidemiological studies be improved? insights from the IMPRESS project

Tropospheric Aerosols - Current Research And Future Air Quality Policy

Analysing agricultural plant protection product concentrations in groundwater in Germany: Nationwide database with site and compound insights

Pesticide impacts on insect pollinators: Current knowledge and future research challenges

Spatial and temporal variations of currently used pesticides (CUPs) concentrations in ambient air in Wallonia, Belgium

Applications of Low-Cost Sensing Technologies for Air Quality Monitoring and Exposure Assessment: How Far Have They Gone?

Opinion: How will advances in aerosol science inform our understanding of the health impacts of outdoor particulate pollution?

Pesticide Levels and Environmental Risk in Aquatic Environments in China — A Review

Water Framework Directive micropollutant monitoring mirrors catchment land use: Importance of agricultural and urban sources revealed

Development of an analytical method for the determination of more than 300 pesticides and metabolites in the particulate and gaseous phase of ambient air

Exposure prediction approaches used in air pollution epidemiology studies: Key findings and future recommendations

Evaluation of the ecological risk of pesticide residues from the European LUCAS Soil monitoring 2018 survey

Monitoring, fate and transport, and risk assessment of organic pollutants in the environment: CREST publications during 2019–2023