Abstract:Recent case law in the UK courts has established the possibility for the parent companies of multinational corporations (MNCs) to hold liability in tort negligence for harms caused by their foreign-based subsidiaries. The UK’s approach – a general duty of care for cross-border torts – is noteworthy in that it has developed organically through the common law despite conflicting with established principles of company law. By comparison, European neighbours such as France, Switzerland and Germany have developed statutory regulatory regimes which utilize due diligence obligations that appear more reflective of recent international accountability standards, such as the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) of the late John Ruggie. This work serves as an in-depth investigation for scholars of tort law, company law, private international law and human rights, who are interested in understanding this rapidly developing area of practice from an English perspective. This work is offered in two parts. This first part contextualizes the current law within contemporary academic discourse and offers a historically informed explanation for the conceptual underpinnings of the unique approach currently taken within English jurisprudence and their coherence with the broader principles of domestic UK company law. The second part offers an analysis of UK law as it stands including the caselaw that builds the corpus of parent company liability in England and Wales. It analyses how effective the current liabilities identified by the Courts are in securing fair remedy for corporate misfeasance. It identifies and categorizes its key features and contrasts them with comparative elements of statutory due diligence approaches adopted by France and Germany or pursued as in the case of Switzerland. It will finally consider whether they offer any concepts worthy of consideration for the regulation of parent company liabilities in future. Parent Company, Corporate Groups, English Company Law, Human Rights Due Diligence, UNGPs, Okpabi, Vedanta, Mass Torts, Supply Chain Liability, Limited Liability

Foreign corporate accountability: The contested institutionalization of mandatory due diligence in France and Germany

Extraterritoriality and Public Procurement Regulation in the Context of Global Supply Chains’ Governance

Towards more sustainable global supply chains? Company compliance with new human rights and environmental due diligence laws

Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence in Germany and Norway: Stepping, or Striding, in the Same Direction?

Multinational Enterprises’ Mandatory Human Rights and Environmental Due Diligence. The Case of European Union Law Underway

Supply Chain Due Diligence Risk Assessment for the EU: A Network Approach to estimate expected effectiveness of the planned EU directive

Due Diligence in International Investment Law

Article: The German Supply Chain Law: A First Step Towards More Corporate Sustainability

Corporate Social Responsibility due diligence among European companies: The results of an interventionist research project with accountability and political implications

Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and the New Boundaries of the Firms in the European Union

The Swiss Human Rights Due Diligence Legislation: Between Law and Politics

Corporate sustainability reporting: double materiality, impacts, and legal risk

Corporate Responses to Tackling Modern Slavery: A Comparative Analysis of Australia, France and the United Kingdom

Filling the Accountability Gap: Misleading Conduct Law in Business and Human Rights

Integration of social and environmental responsibility into legal concepts: the problems of applying the French Law of 2017 «On the duty of due diligence»

Smart mix politics: business actors in the formulation of global supply chain regulation

MNE Microfoundations and Routines for Building a Legitimate and Sustainable Position in Emerging Markets

Government Regulation of International Corporate Social Responsibility in the US and the UK: How Domestic Institutions Shape Mandatory and Supportive Initiatives

‘Cyber Due Diligence’: A Patchwork of Protective Obligations in International Law

Parental Corporate Liability as Tort in the United Kingdom Part I: How the Past Informs the Challenge of Contemporary Regulation

Six research priorities to support corporate due-diligence policies